I don't suppose it would do any good to ask you to provide support your assertion. Naahhh -- never mind. JB
I see. Evolution was 'invented' and it's a massive conspiracy. I don't suppose scientific inquiry had anything to do with it? Inconvenient, but you don't care, I know. Oops, I forgot. Religious mystics don't need science, because all the information they need is received. As far as I can tell, the most immoral, bloodthirsty, criminal people on the planet are religious fanatics. The rest of us just want to be left alone to live our lives in peace. Thank God that people like you are a dying breed and that you're not in charge of educating our children.
LOL -- the only thing "obvious" is that you can't follow the logic of what you wrote. Your above statement is correct .. "no God, no judge.", but your previous assertion was clearly based on *intent*, not just result. You didn't say "the invention of evolution eliminated the judge". You said "evolution was invented TO eliminate the judge ... ". You said this repeatedly, over and over in many slightly different forms. So, unless you can support your assertion that evolution was invented for those purposes, rather than to explain the orgin of the species, you're just another dime a dozen dixie whistler. Just another example of someone who can't follow simple logic -- even as it applies to their own writings. They fall for "let there be light" nearly every time. JB
Hello traderNik, Hey wait a minute, I'm a peaceful kinda guy. Yeah, I totally agree about the religious fanatic part. I think there's gonna be Hell to pay, so to speak, for a lot of people that are doing things in the name of their god. As far as I'm concerned anybody can believe what they want. It just seems to me that it takes more faith to believe in a theory that says nobody x nothing = everything than it does divine creation. As far as science goes... I believe that God "invented" science and imho science backs up creationism more so than big bang/evolution. But hey, if you want to believe all living things originated from a one celled thing that crawled out of a pool of slime that's your business. I mean it's kinda blunt but like they say, " If you don't believe in God you better be right." And I'm referring to God in the book of Genesis. rc
LOL... O.K. Maybe I should have said that "it is obvious in my opinion." But hey, I'm not here to pick over words so forgive me if I didn't elaborate Anyway, what is logical about nobody x nothing = everything?
At that starting point of nobody x nothing, do you think it would take less faith or more faith to believe in a guess that says nobody x nothing = divine creation?
Given that a lot of thought too. I'm definately no theologian but what I can say is that the human mind can only comprehend or rationalize so much. It is hard to explain something that is far more superior than us humans. Besides, if we could explain the one true God... as we can the gods made up by man... then He wouldn't be much of a god. rc
With respect, my query was not about what the human mind may or may not be able to comprehend. Surely we are still in the realm of the comprehensible with your proposal nobody x nothing = divine creation. I merely ask would that require less faith / be more likely, than nobody x nothing = everything. Especially when the fact is the "everything" can be observed.
stu, First of all the equation you proposed...nobody x nothing = divine creation can't exist if you believe in God. What I believe is God -somebody, His power (to create) - something, = everything. Let me post this for you while I type something else for you. I will ask you which way seems more believable to you? Higher power type creation or random type big bang/evolve from nothing? rc