You stu The stars will be out tonight. when I awake in the morning and do not see them does that mean they do not exist ?
So a watch consisting of many pieces all of a sudden appears out of the blue sky ? Like a seiko big bang theory ?
ORIGINAL sin is different from plain vanilla sin. On original sin, see the apostle Paul and Augustine.
In your makebelieve scenario you call The Kingdom, you only have win-win. In mine, you have win-win+1. According to what you say , a system of win-win is not now rational. To gain a win-win you must *lose* the win-win+1 system "because these systems are incompatible." Or do you not follow your own reasoning? stu
Well? Does it? Well? Does it? Let me guess. You might say no and no if you ever do allow yourself to answer any questions at all But according to you, that understanding could not come from another's writings. Science does not take stuff at face value. Science tests and re-tests through the only method which , even when you use only a fragment of its process , allows yourself to pose questions and confirm answers on stars and watches. It's the Scientific Method available to everyone and it's why you would choose it to substantiate a road map and a satnav against a Bible to cross the desert. Even though for some reason you won't admit it. Then why would you believe or have faith in another's writings from an old folk lore story book called the Bible anyway.
======================= You quote me a NY newspaper......,Turok; thats not the exact evidence i gave you.Told you they[History satellite TV] proved it with bloody dna evidence off a porch .... Also gave you exact evidence of footprint they call them; satillite TV netwrok''footprints ''named Daystar, TBN, and add Sky Angel Network-more big footprint evidence for Lord that is,. Sorry,JB, i dont have time to research your medium footprint question, comment on that later. You may or may not be aware of it''smallfoot''or medium foot human; bigfoot ape member is not the same dna .LOLSorry if you chose not to be aware of that ; but thats is your choice. =========================================== Listen i dont know the answer to your medium foot answer; we were talking about big foot,small foot,science , Lord & big satellite footprint.
===================== Exactly, smiley, you hit the target center on that; & original sin like plain vanilla sin , both miss the mark. As you say, smilingS, they are different. Mr. Turok gave me some newspaper evidence of ''bigfoot'' Think the ''2 am stone throw back in the dark '' proves nothing & thats not the evidence i gave you Mr Turok. Hovever at least they admitted it was 2 am in the dark.So really no eyewitnesses there @2 am. Resurrection of Jesus Christ,compared, had over 500 eyewitnesses in Israel; eyewitnesses friends & eyewitnesses enemies. But they admitted the ''irregular dna evidence matched a primate.'' Strange indeed some one would focus on ''up to viewers'' When even the newspaper said''irregular dna evidence matched a primate''. Thanks Turok, i also saw Ben Stein's movie ad /warning about some liking intelligence expelled from science.
scientist= i found no dna expidetion member= i think i found dna http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ijrC9W1jVo&feature=related
Science is the theoretical explanation of phenomena. Theory is an assumption based on limited information or knowledge. Assumption is something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof. So an atheist says one should believe in theories based on assumptions that are not proven ? Sounds the same as believing in God to me
Is there a such thing as a blind atheist ? If one is born blind, and God was to be proven then would the blind atheist still be an atheist ?