Your point -winning is losing- is an irrational one, made no more rational by the large amount of verbiage you dress it all up in. But no offense, you're a hippy, so it's expected.
In that respect a watch does not prove the existence of a watchmaker. I don't expect you to believe anyone's experience about a watchmaker or a watch. So can you substantially prove there is a watchmaker, or do you simply have faith that there is one only because you see a watch? Or is there something else everyone knows they can do, to prove the existence of both a watchmaker and a watch? You are omitting the more important thing lack of evidence does not prove. May I inquire are you ready yet to answer the question I put to you so many times before ?
=============== Good shot,Ammo. Hey and the truth will set you free. Happy passover-a lamb in every house; it started with a lamb in every Hebrew house.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cboy; For starters; ''thou shalt have no other gods before me'' Rather basic , but important Exodus 20 Love the way America was founded on Hebrew Christian foundation/old-new-testament; not false gods like allah And choices have consequences,I am glad when i stole something as a kid, they did NOT cut my hand off like allah's followers teach
================================= That is partial truth, for sure,smiley; & sin means ''miss the mark, a target shooting term'' So we still need a savior/Lord Jesus; surely you dont claim to hit the target all the time, do you????? If you do that is another miss the mark-lying. Thanks,smileyS
================== Turok,title this ''bigfoot'' Turok ; Actually an excellent comparison, because there has been scientific DNA evidence of big foot, as well as hair samples examined by qualified wildlife specialists.Absolutely''unclipped'' hair in north america from an ape[big] family, not bear or human. So really you proved V00's map point.LOL And speaking of ''big foot'' a satellite coverage area is called a ''footprint'';. don't know if you ever seen the TBN, & Daystar ''footprint''?????-Its big,[footprint] world wide Thank you again for you comparison ; proved our point, quite well.Many of us have done that -snared by our own words. The DNA evidence came from blood/flesh wood screws,on a northern porch floorboard,thru History channel; bigfoot broke in a cabin & came back to the scene of his crime. Like V00 implied you don't find Lord because you don't want to; somewhat same as the reason you ''chose '' to miss bigfoot or God on satellite[ large worldwide footprint]TV
MurrayT: >Turok ; >Actually an excellent comparison, because >there has been scientific DNA evidence of big foot, ROFLAO!! OMG! Stop it MT. LOL. GASP! I had no idea that the big boy actually existed. JB
OMG Murray, you are such a gullible dork. http://www.nypost.com/seven/11092007/tv/did_history_channel_find_big_foot__713410.htm Even the group that did the 'research' (and I do use that term loosely) doesn't claim to have determined bigfoot's existence. They say (and it's their quote) "it's up to the viewers". ROFLAO!! Tell me this Oh shelled one -- without a conclusive specimen, what would one (anyone) compare a dna sample against to determine if a visitor was Bigfoot or say Smallfoot or Mediumfoot or Bigscam for that matter? ??? You're are such a laughable duffus, a perfect example of someone who will believe in the "let there be light" crap. Next time you come out of your shell and say that I proved your point, actually present something that proves it. JB
The Kingdom is win-win. A system of win-lose is not rational. To gain a win-lose system, you must *lose* the win-win system because these systems are incompatible. Jesus