Amen...vhehn How do plants absorb nutrients? Through ion exchange, both positely charged(cations > nitrogen=NH4) & -negatively charged(anions > nitrogen=NO3). There is no difference from the plants prospective between ions derive from organic matter or chemical fertilizers... No matter if it's government, agri-business, or the small organic farmer; if the plants do not find the proper nutrients(everyone uses NPK, but not expensive micro's) you harvest garbage. No conspiracy, just cheap farmers/government/business & consumers.
And, which Bible would that be, Sparky? Would that be the Christian version, or the Hebrew? Or, is it the Marcionite Bible? If it's Christian, would that be the King James Version or the New International Version or one of the many variants of each? Not that it matters any. Like most bible-toting maniacs, you've displayed the typical closed-mindedness of someone who's completely missed the point of what any of those, not to mention the texts of other religions, try to teach their followers -- tolerance of others.
huh, thats a long shot ! Teaching tolerance of others!??!?!!? I can see strong evidence of opposite. No need to mention examples.... Religion is a tool to use to benfit of intolerance like robbery, extreme regimes etc,etc. religion just makes sense out of these actions so it can be explained to kids what parents did and kids do not vomit and become the same a bit later on
Yeah, I have no prove that the is NOT a god...but certainly you don't have to prove that there is one -- makes a whole lot of sense. Now prove to me that the Flying Spaghetti Monster or the Invisible Pink Unicorn do not exist. Most of the god touting comments just show how the US education system has failed and to be honest I'm very surprised to read these comments in 2009. Basically what TraderZones is saying is since science has not explained every detail of complicated things such as black holes it has obviously failed, therefore we can explain it through magic (Jesus, god and whatnot).
I completely agree that a lot of bad things have been done in the name of religion. But, my comment was specific to what's written, not what's practiced.
Can you imagine the ignorance level of someone who asks you to provide a formal proof for a negative? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wilb9qqFF-Y
That is NOT what Traderzones said at all. Science has not explained every detail? Science has hardly even started!!! traderzones what saying that science is still in its infancy, and is not something that proves or disproves deity. Especially in the hands of people who using it as a weapon who only have a modest grasp of what science already exists. General -Science-knowledge-wise, I will go toe to toe with most of the ETers trying to wield science as the "Club of Truth" Saying "evolution is truth" is what triggered this. Science is not truth. It is a collection of human practices or methods that allows us testable, repeatable verification or observation of some of the things around us, but in 200 years, scientists will think our current grasp is rather embryonic and often silly.
I'd wish to settle this argument once and for all right here right now but unfortunately time sets its constraints -- therefore I wish you would see the videos of Richard Dawkins (all freely available), he provides answers to almost all of your questions.
you are falsley assuming that traderzones wants the answers. he has a need to believe so will reject anything that does not agree with his primitive book.