Food for Thought: WTC Was Designed to Withstand Direct Impact from a 707 (vid)

Discussion in 'Politics' started by achilles28, Mar 27, 2006.

  1. achilles28

    achilles28

    Look who's talking.


    No, the facts are plain for all to see.

    You just can't bring yourself to face them.

    Fact: the World Trade Towers were designed to withstand a greater impact and fire than that experienced on 9/11.

    Fact: the 767s that hit that day carried 50% less fuel than what those Towers were designed to withstand.

    Fact: The WTC construction manager believed the towers could withstand multiple impacts from airliners - each.


    Fact is, the only way you can make sense of the facts above is by discrediting the evidence to fit the outcome.

    That is called circular logic.
     
    #81     Mar 28, 2006
  2. achilles28

    achilles28


    They is the neocons.

    If you can't see how the sept 11th attacks served to their advantage, it is YOU who is the idiot.

    America funded and trained Al Queda and Osama Bin Laden in the 80's. Osama was our boy at one time.

    Look up Project for New American Century. Thats the neocon think tank that penned a piece by Dick Cheney entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses. In which, a "New Pearl Habor event" was desired that would galvanize popular support for massive military buildup and justify expansion of US power into the middle east.

    That has occured to the T.

    That peice was written in sept 2000. One year before the New Pearl Habor hit.
     
    #82     Mar 28, 2006
  3. achilles28

    achilles28

    "They" own the printing presses that spit out the fiat currency we worship.

    Depressions, recessions and crashes are nothing more than bargain basement sales for the elites to accumulate public property for pennies on the dollar.

    Then, "they" just pump massive credit back into the system to get it back on its feet.
     
    #83     Mar 28, 2006
  4. achilles28

    achilles28

    I originally posted this thread as a casual experiment to observe reaction.

    The original clip just scratches the surface as to the mountains of documentation that proves such a coverup.

    It comes to no surprise then the 'rationale skeptics' who are oblivious to such information, promptly sign off on the clips inconsequence.

    I sincerely recommend any of you who are serious about this country and maintaining an open mind, do your own research.
     
    #84     Mar 28, 2006
  5. this whole thing needs to work backwards starting from the collape of WTC7 which wasnt even touched enough to fall..

    figure out what happend with that and you open a pandora's box imo......
     
    #85     Mar 28, 2006
  6. achilles28

    achilles28

    I agree.

    WTC7 is a much stronger argument than the towers.
     
    #86     Mar 28, 2006
  7. bronks

    bronks

    This is your smoking gun? Christ, if you dig through enough declassified files, you could probably find a memo on protocols for dealing with Godzilla if he happens to attack the eastern seaboard...do we go nuclear or tactical?!

    Get a clue and stop being so paranoid.
     
    #87     Mar 28, 2006
  8. achilles28

    achilles28

    No. Its another piece in the puzzle.

    You couldn't fathom how our Government could benefit from 9/11. And then I gave you a document showing they wanted JUST THAT.


    Smoking gun? No. Motive? Of course.


    Get busy, dumbass.
     
    #88     Mar 28, 2006
  9. achilles28

    achilles28

    Oh yea, the senior membership of the group who authored that document consists of the Vice President, Secretary of Defense, Presidential Advisors (Richard Pearl etc).

    This isn't some obscure contingency plan.

    This was a BLUEPRINT for the strategic direction of the country by a group who immediately came to power shortly after its authorship.

    If you can't grasp its significance, you are beyond help.

    Like everything you've posted on this thread, you've done no research, homework or original thought. What a surprise.
     
    #89     Mar 28, 2006
  10. bronks

    bronks

    You're right, I've done no research.

    But somehow, my position is clearer and more logically thought out than yours.

    Now who's the dumbass...

    Dumbass.
     
    #90     Mar 28, 2006