Food for Thought: WTC Was Designed to Withstand Direct Impact from a 707 (vid)

Discussion in 'Politics' started by achilles28, Mar 27, 2006.

  1. TGregg

    TGregg

    Just when things are getting too confusing, we can always count on Grob to clear the smoke from the air.

    ;)
     
    #151     Mar 30, 2006
  2. Interestingly, building six remained standing, despite being crushed and burnt. They had to use a controlled demolition to bring it down!

    http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc6.html

    "It appears that fires may have raged through WTC 6. The FEMA report, which has extensive discussion about fires in WTC 5, is silent on fires in WTC 6. From the appearance of the remains of WTC 6, it probably had fires similar in severity to those in WTC 5. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires probably more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 6 did not collapse."

    JOhnnyK
     
    #152     Mar 31, 2006
  3. Maybe WTC 6 had better connectors than WTC 1, 2 and 7?
     
    #153     Mar 31, 2006
  4. Pulling gets it's meaning from the practice of blowing a central support first, such that it pulls the rest of the building in toward itself. This way it falls in on itself, rather than out onto other buildings.

    So when you decide to pull a building, then you stand back and watch it collapse...which is what they did. But because Silverstien is not considered a pro demolitions guy, he is allowed to use the word with a double meaning. Indians call it "fork-tongue".

    See example here: http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/imploded.html

    And here: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7exp1.html

    JohnnyK
     
    #154     Mar 31, 2006

  5. Here's a pic of WTC7 from the SOUTHEAST side. Do you see any "hole 20 stories tall "?


    http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7fire1.html
     
    #155     Mar 31, 2006
  6. This hi res overhead photo shows that fires could not bring down the steel buildings IN BETWEEN the two towers and WTC7...despite the poundings they took from falling debri. Why fire not take those down, but take down WTC 7?

    http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzaerial3.html
     
    #156     Mar 31, 2006
  7. I'm surprised this current administration has not asked you to serve already.

    Here's some failed connectors to stuff in your cigar box...
    http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7grid.html

    Perhaps you will spell bronks' name correctly someday.

    JohnnyK:D
     
    #157     Mar 31, 2006
  8. LOL.....
     
    #158     Mar 31, 2006
  9. Thanks for making my point with the graphics. I appreciate it.
     
    #159     Mar 31, 2006
  10. #160     Mar 31, 2006