Just when things are getting too confusing, we can always count on Grob to clear the smoke from the air.
Interestingly, building six remained standing, despite being crushed and burnt. They had to use a controlled demolition to bring it down! http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc6.html "It appears that fires may have raged through WTC 6. The FEMA report, which has extensive discussion about fires in WTC 5, is silent on fires in WTC 6. From the appearance of the remains of WTC 6, it probably had fires similar in severity to those in WTC 5. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires probably more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 6 did not collapse." JOhnnyK
Pulling gets it's meaning from the practice of blowing a central support first, such that it pulls the rest of the building in toward itself. This way it falls in on itself, rather than out onto other buildings. So when you decide to pull a building, then you stand back and watch it collapse...which is what they did. But because Silverstien is not considered a pro demolitions guy, he is allowed to use the word with a double meaning. Indians call it "fork-tongue". See example here: http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/b7/imploded.html And here: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7exp1.html JohnnyK
Here's a pic of WTC7 from the SOUTHEAST side. Do you see any "hole 20 stories tall "? http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7fire1.html
This hi res overhead photo shows that fires could not bring down the steel buildings IN BETWEEN the two towers and WTC7...despite the poundings they took from falling debri. Why fire not take those down, but take down WTC 7? http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzaerial3.html
I'm surprised this current administration has not asked you to serve already. Here's some failed connectors to stuff in your cigar box... http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc7grid.html Perhaps you will spell bronks' name correctly someday. JohnnyK
inconsistencies keep poppin' up tho: http://www.reopen911.org/hijackers.htm maybe there's a chance we don't have da full story and need some answers fast, don't ya think?