Your AR 15 isn’t useful against the government. We take out entire countries, what do you think an AR 15 is going to do?
Well, I am hardly shocked that the binary mind searches for just ONE solution to how to increase security at schools. Don't want you to have a neural overload. So let's just do nothing until the 2nd Amendment is repealed. Nice. Meanwhile, thousands of non-binary thinkers are thinking about what needs to be done or could be done at their school today. Maybe the school in the next state over or in Israel has controlled access point with security screening and armed undercover personnel on site. Maybe we could at least talk about that at the next meeting of the Comprehensive School Security Meeting. Nahhh. that would require thinking on your part. Let's just wait for the ONE solution.
Often it is a handful of people in capital of a country who control the oppression and the use of massive tactics to suppress the people and through the resistance and removal of key people the control of the heavy duty weaponry also changes. I cant completely review with you how history has worked. You have to educate yourself a little. Do you have any information or update today as to whether the FBI actually subpoenaed information from YOUTUBE or if they did or did not get information from them voluntarily?
Defend your home from being burned by BLM thugs organized by politicians opposed to the way you think.
No Mr. Slartibartfast, you claimed the Second Amendment was rendered obsolete by the creation of the U.S. Army when you in fact had both the concept and the chronology backwards. The U.S. Army was founded in 1775 to protect citizens from foreign enemies, while the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791 to protect citizens from potential tyranny of the federal government, to include the U.S. Army. The U.S. Army was in fact founded on June 14, 1775 and had eleven branches by late 1776. What you refer to was a mere formality that isn't even significant enough to be noted by the U.S. Army Center of Military History in their chronology of the Army's beginnings. https://history.army.mil/html/faq/branches.html As for your point that the "2nd never foresaw this kind of firearm," the founders didn't forsee radio, television, or the internet either but the First Amendment still applies. Just as the Second Amendment applies today to contemporary weapon technology. It's not a "relic" nor is it a "law" and James Madison's overarching concept in Federalist 46 is as valid and applicable now as it was when he wrote it. In trading terms it was a put on tyranny, and it remains a put on tyranny. The "relic" argument is a lazy strawman. The simple fact that The Art of War by Sun Tzu (which was written 2500 years ago) is still widely studied is proof that some concepts are timeless.
I'm not American but you should understand the difference between founded and officially integrated into the new state. You interpretation is very typical of a partial autistic. And wrong.
So you are denying that the U.S. Army was started on June 14, 1775 -- as regularly stated by the U.S. Army. Enjoy your re-writing of history.