why the fukc dont u all skeptics [or bilnd believers i suppose] dont come out with reasonable criticisms against all the overwhelmin' evidence presented in this thread against the admn instead than rantin' we all lunatics...lemme guess, thats right, innocent even tho proven guilty cuz they cannot possibly have done such an evil act, do they. gimme a break...wake up and smell the coffee.
$orry, my bad. Thi$ overwhelming evidence of yours override$ dozen$ of eyewitne$$e$ who $aw the plane crash into the Pentagon. $o, uh, under your theory, all the people that were on the flight$ are where???? Let me gue$$, Area 51, right!!! One more thing, let me thank you for the ingeniou$ new way of typing the letter "S". Almo$t as brilliant as the web$ite$ you conspiracy theori$t$ get your information from. $ee you behind the gra$$y knoll, Jag. J out. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
since when eyewitness accounts [easly coherced by the way] carry more weight than factual evidence? if somethin' u can use it to strenghten a case and reinforce already existin' evidence not the otherway around, innit.
Gee, why are the time stamps edited off of those photos? Why don't you ask the surviving families of those who perished, the workers who carried out the dead bodies and jetliner parts, and the airline that lost the airplane if it really happened?
Here's a link for YOU to look at. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77 Here's the first paragraph; American Airlines Flight 77 was a morning flight that routinely flew from Washington Dulles International Airport in Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia, near Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles International Airport (IAD-LAX). On September 11, 2001, while being piloted by Charles Burlingame, and First Officer Dave Charlebois, the Boeing 757-223, N644AA, was hijacked as part of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Over an hour into the flight, it was crashed into the Pentagon, killing 64 on the plane and 125 in the buildings. It was the third airliner to crash that morning, 50 minutes after the first, and another half hour later than the second explosion. Names, tail number, etc. Why don't you conspiracy theorists grow the F**K up!
uh..and with that what have u proved or disproved? nuthin'.. the title of this thread is spot on and i cannot understand for the life of me why u dont want to clear up this mess once and for all since is ridden with deception and corruption...almost all the families involved in the attack want the investigation re-opened and all u doin' is placin' a lid on it and drinkin' all the piss those bastards in power throw at u...yeah how patriotic....wtg.
NO WAY! A link with actual FACTS?! Maybe I'm just being naive again for not realizing that wikipedia is just another right wing conspiracy to dumb-down America.
any Right wing George Bush is god wacko have an answer to why building WTC7 fell yet or are they still ignoring the question like the 9/11 commission did???? :eek: :eek: :eek:
CLAIM: Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?" FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts
No wacko here. CLAIM: Seven hours after the two towers fell, the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed. According to 911review.org: "The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one." FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately 10 stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner. NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse. According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down." There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities. Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time." WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors--along with the building's unusual construction--were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.