Wow! Now who really GAS? KooKie & Twisted relevance somehow -? - I might add. Try a different thread. This thread rarely is visited back by those on the green pills.
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholars find profoundly troubling: In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible? The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible? Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible? Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700°F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800°F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000°F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible? Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible? Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. :eek: How is this possible? Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?":eek: The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible? A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible? A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible? :eek: The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible? Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints. These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality." They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.:eek:
It's getting closer, the truth may finally come out? 9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon Allegations Brought to Inspectors General Wednesday, August 2 "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described," John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview. "The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. . . . This is not spin. This is not true." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html Dr. Robert Bowman a former fighter pilot and war hero who flew over 120 combat missions, gives his thoughts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEIj9wPQnMk&mode=related&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I&mode=related&search=
Obviously they have not lived in Hong Kong and heard of the main railway station scandal. It is a fact that a lot of buildings are overdesigned and builders know this. Hence they did not put in all the foundation that was required - some foundation pillars did not exist at all....... Other pillars did not have the required amount of steel in them or the steel was not the specified stuff (high tensile, thickness etc).... Others did not go the required depth.... Oh and the "public was never in any danger" yeah right... Ofcourse this has to be covered up as much as possible.... holmes
The fact that the American government did this to its own people is so OBVIOUS that I fail to understand how people can think otherwise. I can understand the 29% bushits believing that Bush wasn't involved in this, but what about the other 71%?!! come on guys, put your thinking caps on. You think the Saudi wahabis put the thermite in there?!! You think there is no connection between the security company owned by Bushes younger brother (financed by the govt of UAE) and the out of the ordinary evacuation drills before 9/11?!! you think there is no connection between the ORDERED powerdown and evacuation of the top 50 floors few weeks before 9/11 is not something to be looked into?!! < shakes his head >.
Will the REAL truth please step forward? My brother sent me this link rebutting the sell off of the scrap steel. http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/ussnewyork.htm I actually remember hearing about this China deal back then - but I can't find any rebuttal sites to counter his web link BS. (or maybe there is some truth to the ship deal too? It tis possible.) bsmeter do you have any websites documenting the China dealings? Notice how NO ONE on ET has commented on the photo of the white squiggly thing in the Pentagon photo posted earlier? IMO -That is Baaaaaaahhhhh-d. Politics of the third rail exist here too.
Too many college kid websites and Michael Moore movies for you youngsters. This thread is worse than JFK and Area 51 conspiracy sites. Let me see if I understand this - When the WTC is attacked under a democrat, radical muslims are responsible. When the WTC and Pentagon are attacked under a republican, it's a vast right wing conspiracy. Is this correct?
The Illuminati did it. (grassy knoll, Elvis, Hoffa and Amelia Earhart are alive, we never landed on the Moon...........)
Don't be such a pu$$y and go on record here what you see in the photograph. The nose of a 757 - really? http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/uncropped.html