I think it was a week after Obama got elected, I sent Obama an e mail and asked him the same thing, "don't we have more important issues than getting re-elected?"
Suppose it could. That event would get buried very quickly. As it is now, I think tptb are going to oulaw psychiatriac treatment for sexual orientation. They'd probably do the same for any brain modification which could be defined as a brain injury.
Aside from the common-sense observation of gays and their gay attributes and the fact that choosing to be gay just means more troubles so why would they do it...... Blanchard and Klassen (1997) reported that each older brother increases the odds of a man being gay by 33%.[21][22] This occurs even with gays raised away from their older brothers. This has been proven in multiple studies in various countries. Gay men and straight women have, on average, equally proportioned brain hemispheres. Lesbian women and straight men have, on average, slightly larger right brain hemispheres.[51] The VIP SCN nucleus of the hypothalamus is larger in men than in women, and larger in gay men than in heterosexual men.[52] The average size of the INAH-3 in the brains of gay men is approximately the same size as INAH 3 in women, which is significantly smaller, and the cells more densely packed, than in heterosexual men's brains.[31] The anterior commissure is larger in women than men and was reported to be larger in gay men than in non-gay men,[30] but a subsequent study found no such difference.[53] Gay men's brains respond differently to fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.[54] The functioning of the inner ear and the central auditory system in lesbians and bisexual women are more like the functional properties found in men than in non-gay women (the researchers argued this finding was consistent with the prenatal hormonal theory of sexual orientation).[55] The suprachiasmatic nucleus was found by Swaab and Hopffman to be larger in gay men than in non-gay men,[56] the suprachiasmatic nucleus is also known to be larger in men than in women.[57] The startle response (eyeblink following a loud sound) is similarly masculinized in lesbians and bisexual women.[58] Gay and non-gay people's brains respond differently to two putative sex pheromones (AND, found in male armpit secretions, and EST, found in female urine).[27][59][60] The amygdala, a region of the brain, is more active in gay men than non-gay men when exposed to sexually arousing material.[61] Finger length ratios between the index and ring fingers may be different between non-gay and lesbian women.[55][62][63][64][65][66] Gay men and lesbians are significantly more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous than non-gay men and women;[67][68][69] Simon LeVay argues that because "[h]and preference is observable before birth[70]... [t]he observation of increased non-right-handness in gay people is therefore consistent with the idea that sexual orientation is influenced by prenatal processes," perhaps heredity.[31] A study of 50 gay men found 23% had counterclockwise hair whorl, as opposed to 8% in the general population. This may correlate with left-handedness.[71] Gay men have increased ridge density in the fingerprints on their left thumbs and pinkies.[71] Length of limbs and hands of gay men is smaller compared to height than the general population, but only among white men.[71] [edit]Cognitive Recent studies suggest the presence of subtle differences in the way gay people and non-gay people process certain kinds of information. Researchers have found that: Gay men[72] and lesbians are more verbally fluent than heterosexuals of the same sex[73][74][75] (but two studies did not find this result).[76][77] Gay men may receive higher scores than non-gay men on tests of object location memory (no difference was found between lesbians and non-gay women).[78] Birth order Blanchard and Klassen (1997) reported that each older brother increases the odds of a man being gay by 33%.[21][22] This is now "one of the most reliable epidemiological variables ever identified in the study of sexual orientation."[23] To explain this finding, it has been proposed that male fetuses provoke a maternal immune reaction that becomes stronger with each successive male fetus. This maternal immunization hypothesis (MIH) begins when cells from a male fetus enter the mother's circulation during pregnancy or while giving birth.[24] Male fetuses produce HY antigens which are "almost certainly involved in the sexual differentiation of vertebrates."
Because their perversion is so important to them maybe? Well that settles it for me. Are these the same "scientists" working on global warming?
Horseshit, from where I sit. Back in the day where families were a lot larger (10 and 12 children), you never saw the frequency in gay behavior that you see today. Yes, society was far more closed, and you can make an argument there were some closet gays, but please.