Then set me straight - You seem to be saying that people , in general, don't believe in the JFK conspiracy. You say that it's obvious to you that there WAS a conspiracy, even though you don't know how it went down.... So you're using your BELIEF in the JFK conspiracy to back your claims that since people, in your OPINION, are wrong about that, that then they can wrong about the Fed conspiracy too. I'd call that a pretty clear case of using your own beliefs to bolster your point. Arguments should be made on facts, not beliefs and lies.
I'm just gonna have to believe you are dimwitted after that effort Are you ever going to answer the question why the founding fathers fought so fervently against foreign owned Central Banks???
Ok then - yes , the FFs didn't want th banks to be foreign owned. And they aren't. The statement that they are is a lie concocted by moonbat conspiracy theorists... Conclusion The allegation that an international banking cartel controls the Federal Reserve is wrong. Contrary to Kahâs claim, foreigners do not own any stock in the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Neither do they currently own any significant shares of the domestic banks that actually do own shares in the N.Y. Fed. Moreover, the central assumption that control of the New York Federal Reserve is the same as control of the whole System is badly mistaken. Also, the profits of the Federal Reserve System, again contrary to the conspiracy theorists, are funneled almost entirely back to the federal government, not to an international banking elite. If the U.S. central bank is in the grip of an international conspiracy, then Mullins, Kah, et al have certainly not uncovered it.
LOL - I know and you know that this is the answer of the defeated, cuz if you tried to backtrack I'd cut you to ribbons on your doubletalk
You're naive.. and thats only cute in small children and my girlfriends http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html
Take what you like and leave the rest, eh? The Fed Money Problem would be just as insidious if Bill Gates owned the Bank instead of the Rothschilds. PRIVATE OWNERSHIP is the key issue at hand, Cut and Paste. Its just icing on the proverbial cake our economy is in the hands of European banking families (and not an American one). But if you'd like to make foreign ownership the object of your ire, please do. Id like to see another steller debunking of Fed foreign ownership. Is the Congressional Banking Committee chart wrong? Seriously. Is that chart wrong or invalid?
1- I like this chart, it shows that Congress investigated the ownership of the various banks, and therefore who controls the Fed 2- since it is law that foreigners may not own more than a trivial amount in the Fed (The law prohibits the general public, non-bank firms, and foreigners from owning anything more than a trivial amount of stock in any Federal Reserve Bank (12 USCA §283). ) it means that they found everything to be ok. 3- to prove that it is non-trivial ownership, YOU CLOWNS need to come up with ownership %ages of the various banks, and prove that they have a controlling interest in more than 1/2 of the banks in the ENTIRE Fed system, since voting in the banks is different than with normal public companies - Moreover, the ownership rights of Federal Reserve Bank stock are different than the common stock of typical corporations. Usually, the number of votes a shareholder has is proportional to the number of shares he owns. However, ownership of Federal Reserve Bank stock entitles the shareholder to one vote when voting for its regional Federal Reserve Bank officials regardless of how many total shares the member bank may own. 4- Thanks for making my point for me