Federal Reserve: fact or conspiracy?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by rselitetrader, Jul 27, 2010.

  1. Hello

    Hello

    The jerkstore called they said they are running out of you!!!!!........:)


     
    #91     Jul 27, 2010
  2. Hello

    Hello

    Disregarding the poor english, apparently Faber thinks the market has spiked recently in terms of volatility.....Go FABER!!!!!!!

    Anyone who actually trades for a living and pays attention to the VIX might have a different argument.....

     
    #92     Jul 27, 2010
  3. Hello

    Hello

    Im eagerly awaiting Peter Schiff, and Marc Faber, i want someone to show me how to trade!!!!
     
    #93     Jul 27, 2010
  4. Hello

    Hello

    Still eagerly awaiting a response from you......I wont hold my breath to long as Faber has already embarassed you plenty.
     
    #94     Jul 27, 2010
  5. Daal

    Daal

    Well, its hard to debate someone who doesnt mean what he says
     
    #95     Jul 27, 2010
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    No, I meant exactly what I said, you just didn't understand it. Apparently you have very little understanding of the effect wars have on the manufacturing base of a country's economy. Like I said, go back and study the rise of Nazi Germany and get back to me.
     
    #96     Jul 27, 2010
  7. Hello

    Hello

    You going to respond to anything, or continue to let these two twits embarass you? You owe maverick an apology on behalf of the dickhead/non trader marc faber.

     
    #97     Jul 27, 2010
  8. Hello

    Hello

    Damn man, the whole debate is gone now cause of achilles 28..... anyways, cheers dude, it was a good debate.... and thanks to market masher, for pulling out the real marc faber bullshit.

     
    #98     Jul 27, 2010
  9. A change in thinking is needed, excessive borrowing/spending is not the way to go.

    Agree with your higher rates comment. Things need to slow down.

     
    #99     Jul 27, 2010
  10. It's not lazy thinking, it's realistic thinking. Your idea doesn't sound viable to me... You already have all these pundits making their views known in the media, papers, etc? Unless you have a mechanism of enforcing that these views are actually taken into account in the decision-making process, what good is a sounding-board? You'd have to allow Taleb and Roubini to vote, god forbid, to make this actually of any use.
    I don't really think it's worthwhile to keep going on this subject, but I am really not sure I understand what funding advantage/cheap money you might be referring to.
     
    #100     Jul 28, 2010