@Realist, Take care. Your commentary has been appreciated. Your fundamental/technical analysis has always been very unbiased and spot-on. Anyone with half a pulse and an iota of reading comprehension would see that if they took 2 minutes to peruse this thread.
Realist thank you very much for everything, I don't blame you for leaving but i am sad to see you go. Happy trading brother
its 10 till 11 on the west coast and gold is 10 below 900 on cbot ....lol? i hope atleast some one here made 3 grand per contract last night!
Realist - i found your commentary annoying, as well as the shills to try to start a subscriber service, as well as the other aliases you use to justify your existence. good luck elsewhere.
Dspec, although I appreciate his comments and can't comment on his fundamental analysis I find his technical analysis biased and also detrimental to other members trying to learn what a trend is, and is NOT about guessing where an indicator is going to go... or is it? I've heard dozens of trend definitions over the years on this board and they all make more sense then a MACD that is "ABOUT" to roll over... PLEEEEEASSSE.
No. My view is that diluting money supply (i.e. int rate cuts) = dollar devaluation = increase in gold prices.