This has nothing to do with the law and I never said it did. This is simply a matter of students properly vetting their propsective mentors before they ripped off.
Qwerty is one of those well meaning/successful mentors. I know because I am working with him now and as of today, I am up $1,000
The bottom line is, you can't teach if you are not qualify to teach. It's simple logic like 1+1=2. If you still can't understand that Qwerty/Ed, then you got to stay far away from the market as possible, because you are way behind in this game. You'd end up losing all your snake oil money to the market. PA
That's the stupidest comment I've ever heard.. You can't teach if you're not qualified.. What if you're not qualified by academic standards but learned to read on your own and command expertise on the English language and taught English? You can still teach a damn good lesson but oh, you're not qualified so therefore you can't teach.. Right... The holes in your argument, Pension_Admin, are becoming more and more apparent to us all as you write.
PA, Have you noticed that ED and QWERTY have exectly the same writing style? Same run-on sentences strung together with commas, same capitalization mistakes, etc. It's obvious that QWERTY is his own shill named ED. It's been obvious from the beginning, but it's fun and amusing watching him take the bait.
Ah, and so you must be the English major and the grammar police as well, arrest me if you can tomdavis.
edtradernyc/Qwerty, I hope this is only shill-talk and not for real, because I'd be very sorry for you. There was no sentence in your posting that could be considered a logical thought. The concept of using qualifications to weed out the charlatans to find true expert is not in your head. If an Asian guy walk up to you and claim he is Michael Jackson, I am sure you would believe him and pay $1,000 for a ticket to see him sing in a karaoke bar.