FBI Plot uncovered - is this Prima Facie Treason?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Dec 13, 2017.

  1. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    I think it's possible that their hubris was (and is) so great that it prevented them from thinking that anyone would ever call them on it. They likely never thought Hillary would be defeated.
     
    #11     Dec 13, 2017
  2. UsualName

    UsualName

    #12     Dec 13, 2017
  3. jem

    jem

    Its not partisan for me. Trump may not be very smart. He does act like an idiot at times.
    He was elected because he was not part of the swamp.

    If Trump turns out to be guilty he should go to jail too.
    That is why I said they need to find a independent special counsel to do Mueller's job.
    I am not trying to protect trump. I don't care about him anymore. He is not executing on the agenda we voted him in on.


    I am trying to convey the fact that this on its face this is the most serious treason I have read about in American history. I say that without any hyperbole. Maybe there were others I have just no read about them. ( JFK stuff is unproven in my mind)

    You can't have your nations intelligence community working with your nations cops to take down and incoming president. unless they had proof he was a criminal.

    If they have some proof he was committing a crime with Russia then they have a defense and it was not Treason. If they don't ... I don't know what it is if not Treason.







     
    #13     Dec 13, 2017
    Good1 likes this.
  4. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    So.....you are fine with top level FBI agents politicizing the FBI, using it to be political operatives and allowing the FBI to undermine our democracy?
     
    #14     Dec 13, 2017
  5. They were efficient too. If Stolz wanted to discuss how much he hated trump with another agent, well his mistress was right there working on it too, and she was an fbi agent.

    If Ohr wanted to talk about the dossier as a "smart agent analyzing the trump situation correctly" then, hey, who better to analyze it with than his wife who was over at Fusion developing it?

    Smart agents, they are. Might get shot in some countries for being part of the state security apparatus and doing that type of thing, but not to worry when Comey and Loretta were in charge.

    And Loretta was "analyzing" it out on the tarmac. Yeh, that be smart too.
     
    #15     Dec 13, 2017
  6. UsualName

    UsualName

    No. I am not fine with fbi agents politicizing the fbi. I think it was right to remove this Strjork character. Im not convinced at all the text messages were indicative of any shenanigans.

    I’m also not fine with Trump politicizing the fbi. I am also not fine with Russia undermining our democracy and trump saying it is fake news and firing the fbi Director because of it either.

    Y’all need to stop reading Breitbart. Go read the text messages in their rightful context. Then get back to me. You guys go deep into a rabbit hole and never come back some times.
     
    #16     Dec 13, 2017
  7. UsualName

    UsualName

    There are just as many pro trump agents in the fbi, if not more than were pro Clinton.
     
    #17     Dec 13, 2017
    exGOPer and Slartibartfast like this.
  8. Breaking down trust (and morale) in the FBI is 100 times easier than it is to build. You need an FBI staffed with thinking professional people who command some respect. Trump is the opposite of professional, he is all instinct and bluster.

    You need the FBI, you don't need a Trump. You will know that when it is too late.
     
    #18     Dec 13, 2017
    exGOPer and Tony Stark like this.
  9. That's kind of the point. What are the chances that only pro Hillary agents ended up on these cases? Just random chance?
     
    #19     Dec 13, 2017
    TreeFrogTrader and jem like this.
  10. jem

    jem

    I hope I am wrong about the FBI. So could you link me to the text messages which give us the context that the plan was not a treasonous plan to take down Trump in case he won.

     
    #20     Dec 13, 2017