FBI arrests would-be Capitol bomber outside D.C.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Trader666, Feb 17, 2012.

  1. This from the cowardly islamofascist bootlicker who's never worn the uniform and is so scared shitless of having to fight for his country that he blames 9/11 on us.
     
    #11     Feb 18, 2012
  2. Really? Google al-Qaeda and you'll see they're active all over the world and doing shit that's not even remotely connected to us.

    What about all the problems with radical Islam overseas that have nothing to do with us? They tried appeasement under the euphemism of "multiculturalism" and it failed spectacularly:

    In the UK:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12371994
    In France:
    http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/February/Frances-Sarkozy-Multiculturalism-Has-Failed/
    In Germany:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed
    In the Netherlands:
    http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2219/netherlands-abandons-multiculturalism

     
    #12     Feb 18, 2012
  3. pspr

    pspr

    I'm more than a little confused and concerned that every time there is a plot to blow up something in the U.S. the FBI (or other agency) knows all about it and has acted to provide the perpetrator with fake explosive material. This has happend more than a couple times in the last year or two.

    This makes me think of two possibilities.

    1) The FBI and other national crime fighting agencies have become incredibly good at infiltrating and finding EVERY person or group that wants to harm Americans. I find this hard to fathom in its entirety. Or

    2) The FBI and other agencies are so desperate to show the public that they are effectively stopping terrorists that they are actually creating the terrorist plots by finding some willing dolt to set up to into thinking he can and should do this and then supplying the method and material for him to take the action they put into his mind.

    I honestly don't know which is the truth or if it is a combination of both.
     
    #13     Feb 18, 2012
  4. 6, when you say, "us" you confuse them with the people living in these borders who just trying to eat, raise kids, and stay on the right side of the law.

    It is time for you to call me a Paultard, now.

    The people that I speak of are international in scope also, and have always kept a West vs. East conflict in place. Whether it is the Russians, or the Japanese, or the Chinese, or the Middle East, they have kept that us vs. them thing going.

    Permawar.......

    Keep us worrying about the other.

    Did you know that only 6 companies own ALL of the cable channels we watch?

    Expand your perception of who, we, are. If you do that, you find that, we, are also in all the places you mentioned.

    Create a problem, then solve it.

    They allow a situation to get to critical mass, and then say we have to eradicate it.

    I drank that kool aid too, some years ago. It took a lot of time see things as they are.
     
    #14     Feb 18, 2012
  5. It is not hard to infiltrate group that you had a hand in creating. Also, we have to keep terror in place.

    It is a perfect setup, an undefined organization with undefined borders. It is truly a thing of art.

    They can call anybody they want a terrorist without any kind of due process, and they can use any means they want to do it, anywhere, anytime.

    Some will fight, but they have been prepping for a very long time. The dumbing down is complete and fairly soon, discussions like these will lead to re-education.

    Just know what is happening and why, it is really all we can do.
     
    #15     Feb 18, 2012
  6. rew

    rew

    That he's neither an Iraqi nor an Iranian.

    Glad I could help.
     
    #16     Feb 18, 2012
  7. The common denominator is radical Islam.

    Glad I could help.
     
    #17     Feb 18, 2012
  8. What are you trying to say? That it's all a conspiracy to keep us in a state of "permawar?" That the problems with radical Islam in the UK, France, Germany and the Netherlands that I gave you links to don't really exist? What about these (below)? AIPAC propaganda? :p

    Al Qaeda Africa wing threatens to kill western hostages
    http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/sahara-qaeda-threat-idINDEE80B0JN20120112

    Al Qaeda takes key town in Yemen
    http://bostonglobe.com/news/world/2...men-capital/ncDvH2V3ktO4GVVzzlPyzJ/story.html

    Al Qaeda targeting more American jihadist recruits in Yemen
    http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/258804

    Americans on the rise in Al Shabab's ranks
    http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/americas/americans-on-the-rise-in-al-shababs-ranks

    DHS and FBI issue bulletin warns of 'Digital Jihad' threat
    http://www.examiner.com/homeland-se...-issue-bulletin-warns-of-digital-jihad-threat

    Al-Qaeda-linked group asserts responsibility for 37 Baghdad attacks
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ks-continues/2012/01/09/gIQAzL6klP_story.html

    Justice department arrests Al Qaeda sympathizer
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71238.html

    Al Qaeda sends fighters to Libya
    http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/30/al-qaeda-sends-fighters-to-libya/

    Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders seek Pakistani militants' help to fight US forces
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...istani-militants-help-to-fight-US-forces.html

    Al Qaeda emboldened by lull in US drone strikes in Pakistan
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...drone-strikes-Pakistan.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

    Syria Blames Al Qaeda After Bombs Kill Dozens in Damascus
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/w...-says-suicide-bombers-attack-in-damascus.html

    Al Qaeda kidnaps Algerian governor: security sources
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-algeria-libya-kidnaptre80g1dm-20120117,0,1494700.story

     
    #18     Feb 18, 2012
  9. Its all about oil & power to the Arabs. This is a bit of an oversimplification of history, but here it goes. Westerners came to what was Persia/ottoman empire, some 100+ years ago looking for oil many agreements were made, one of which comes to mind was when we had an agreement to pay them I believe $500k to $700k in gold in the 1930s to get oil in specific areas for a term of 60 years. Then different Arabs come to power, nationalize the oil companies a few years later, and we get cheated. I know Britian threatened military action in the 1950s but never went to war, but the Arabs pulled this shit so many times over the last 70 years or so and thats why we go to war with them. They are trying to fuck us out of our agreement everytime someone new comes to power and make us pay for oil we already paid for. (Like i said this is an oversimplification, but its accurate none-the-less). So now when someone else comes to power and tries to screw our american companies out of agreements made in the past, we go to war because we saw how quickly the british empire fell apart when they let that shit slide. (for those that dont remember, the british used to control almost everything).

    So we go to war because Arabs in power dont want to live up to previous agreements and they get the uneducated population to believe its a "holy war" and we are trying to steal "their" oil (even though its them basically stealing oil we already paid for) and they then form groups like al queda and such and believe they are fighting for Islam, but in reality they are unwittingly fighting for oil & the people in power.
     
    #19     Feb 18, 2012
  10. ammo

    ammo

    sounds a lot like US troops fighting wars in the name of protecting america when really they are enriching oil companies who need our military protection to extract oil and build wells,the US couldnt have bought the entire mideast in your fable,just a piece
     
    #20     Feb 18, 2012