Elizabeth Warren's huge own-goal: All the ways her DNA stunt backfired By S.E. Cupp Oct 18, 2018 If ever there were a more colossally stupid political stunt than Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren releasing her DNA results in a dim-witted attempt to “own” President Trump, I honestly can’t think of one. Michael Dukakis’ tanker ride comes close, but at least you could argue his made sense on paper; just the visual was a failure. This — a splashy video proclaiming her Oklahoma roots and Native American ancestry — made no sense, none at all. It was, I suppose, meant to put to bed one of Trump’s favorite taunts, calling her “Pocahontas” for claiming to be part Native American. But all it did was prove she is in no way prepared to take him on in 2020. Here’s what else this stunning unforced error showed. She’s getting terrible advice. Politically, a good adviser would know this would look silly at best and anger actual Native Americans, at worst. And did it. When the Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr. says, “Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage,” you know it’s bad. Perhaps they might have been forewarned had they, say, reached out to folks like Hoskin first. And yet, he says neither Warren nor anyone on her staff contacted the Cherokee Nation before declaring her heritage. These are rookie PR mistakes. She didn’t see the criticism coming. “Warren might even be less Native American than the average European American,” blared an RNC press release in the wake of her “smoking gun.” How this wasn’t anticipated when her DNA tests only showed she was as little as 1/1024th Native American is astonishing. Fifth graders can grasp that math. So now, not only is she forced to confront the anger among the very community she’s insisting she’s a part of, but she has to perform some comical contortions around the meaning of the results. She does not get how Trump fights. Bringing facts to a Trump fight is like bringing a ladle to a gun fight. Indeed, he was as bothered by this as he would be a light breeze. “Who cares, who cares?” he told reporters. It doesn’t even matter that Republicans and even many in the media are overblowing the inaccuracy of her claims. Glenn Kessler, the Washington Post’s fact checker, admirably tried to clarify this, explaining that “the results in Warren’s DNA test are static” and “the percentage of Native American DNA in her genome does not shrink as you go back generations.” But all most hear is “blah, blah, blah” and no one cares. If her 2020 plan is to beat Trump with...information...boy, is Warren in for a rude awakening. She just screwed her own party. Less than three weeks before midterms, this is not what any Democrat wants to be talking about. Even those who aren’t up for election in 2018 are having trouble sidestepping the question. Julian Castro, a 2020 contender, was asked about it on CNN this week, and the best he could muster was that she “should never have been put in that position,” and as to whether it was helpful for Democrats, he said it was “neither here nor there.” That’s some defense. Identity politics is a loser. Still. Democrats doubling down on identity politics when Trump has proven that largely defeatable will never cease to amaze. And backfire. A white senator insisting she is Native American and then providing the evidence that she isn’t in any meaningful way isn’t endearing her to voters. Issues, not identities, are what voters care about. But this, too, is presumably a lesson Warren will not have learned from this debacle. The question is, can she figure all of this out by 2020?
Actually.... and I stated this before... I am not a Trump fan... there are policies I like and others I dislike from his administration. My primary problems with him is his excessive narcissism, sub-standard world understanding, and his communication style. Many times I hope the Democratic party can find a middle-of-the-road, intelligent challenger for 2020 but I don't see this happening at the moment -- most of the proposed candidates lean strongly to the left (which makes them un-electable in the general election). The reality -- at the moment -- is that I don't see any road to taking Trump out of office in 2020. Sitting presidents have significant election advantages and it is likely he will stay in office. If Trump gets impeached or charged than I will re-evaluate his chances. -- but for now I assume he will be in office for 8 years.
Well, the last one they had who fit that description was Jimmie Carter, so let's not hope too hard. We're still suffering from his screwups. Anyway, the dems are not nominating anyone to the right of Bernie. They are now officially a far left nutcase party of the sort that has destroyed numerous countries in both Latin America and Europe.