https://t.me/dnfad/2692 https://t.me/dnfad/2693 The last position was closed at breakeven, as discussed in the attached links. The price started to go down well, but there was quite strong support below. Price thought on the support, but thanks to USDJPY, and increased volatility, was able to go back up. Correlation played a role.
Timeframes Good evening. Immediately on topic, timeframes, for convenience further in the text will be familiar to you and us, the TF. A set of recommendations that will help you improve your trading results, maybe (well, 0.5% for sure, because the other 99.5% are looking for the grail). So the TF is a very interesting thing, a lot depends on it. A couple of years ago I had an ingenious idea: the sum does not change if you rearrange the places of the components. So why not try to use non-standard TF? Not just m5/15/30, H1 and H4. But anything that fits between the standard MT4 timeframes. Interesting, isn't it? And I tried it. Since then, for me, the standard TFs and those who only use them are cavemen. Logic, which I was guided by the choice of TF, because in fact, if you have a good terminal, you can make absolutely any TF. Let's say not M30, but M32, how do you like this idea? It is a great idea, but for me it was logical to put the lower non-standard TF in the higher ones. For example: three M5 candlesticks are one M15, two M15 candlesticks are one 30, four M15 candlesticks are H1. Here, and this is the logic I used. Let's say H1 is 60 minutes, so we find all the numbers that are divisible by 60. And we get M1-2-3-4-5-6-10-12-15-20-30. I think you should not even compare with M1-5-15-30. I did this with all the TF up to the annual. Let's say you look at D1, W1 and MN and I can't imagine my trading without D1-2-3-4-5-6, W1-2-3-4. It's also interesting for MN. We take one year, 12 months and divide. We get MN1-2-3-4-6. What does that give me and what is the point? It's very simple: vastness of observation, finding things that are hidden to normal eyes, and a lot of extra signals. Yes, my system is poor in signals and confirms the rule that 85-95% of its movement the market is sideways, regardless of the TF. Accordingly, the system cannot give signals too often because it works on the movement after the uncertainty (sideways movement). Then follow the rules I have developed and am still developing. The rules polish the patterns like polishing a monument to a perfectly smooth surface. At this stage it is good if 0.5% of the patterns are taken for further work. So it turns out that there are not enough signals, we need something to compensate for them, and the non-standard TF is the best solution.