facebook ipo - opinions - play by play - keep it brief

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by bellman, May 16, 2012.

  1. I don't respond to foreign scum.

    This proves that almost 100% of the membership are twats or imbeciles.
     
    #181     May 19, 2012
  2. Yet you quote him in your reply. Excelsior! Delicate genius!
     
    #182     May 19, 2012
  3. ashantt

    ashantt

    WHY DO YOU FUCKING MORONS ARGUE ON AN ANONYMOUS BOARD?
    AND I BET ANYTHING MOST OF YOU MORONS ARE OVER 40 YEARS OLD. GROWN FUCKING MEN, CALLING EACH OTHER NAMES ON AN ANONYMOUS BOARD! YOU CAN'T BE SUCCESSFUL TRADERS. THAT MUCH, I CAN CONCLUDE.
     
    #183     May 20, 2012
  4. Because it's geographically incongruent to argue in person. Fcuking duh. What are you doing here, Mr. Sassy Caps? Cool story, tho.
     
    #184     May 20, 2012
  5. As someone previously stated wasn't the buy just above 38.00 say 38.01 about as low risk as can be found. The chances of Morgan letting it break below the figure seems slight. I don't trade stocks and expected the offering to do somewhat better on day one so I missed it but can any active equity trader miss this trade?

    The "I'll buy all ya got" bid at 38.00 was pretty predictable on day one -- particularly early in the day when the green shoe was still largely intact.
     
    #185     May 20, 2012
  6. Yes, it was a predictable and crowded trade: it cuts both ways. Yes, you could buy at 38.01 but for a large part of the day your only exit was at 38.0 - if you knew to get out at 41-42 several hours before the close, well that's dandy - but how would you know this was the going to be the best price for rest of the day (possibly ever)?

    I think the underwriters used the green shoe effectively and are now out (despite all the misinformation in the press saying MS et al hold billions of stock). Nobody expects 38 to hold next week.

    I think the syndicate just about got it away cleanly (can anyone confirm with some actual facts?).
     
    #186     May 20, 2012
  7. When was the last time a sophisticated underwriter put up their own money (in size) to peg a deal? When that green shoe is gone -- sometime within 11 minutes of the Monday open -- they may pick their spots to do some token buying --and selling -- but they know that being buried in a position is simply not good business.

    On Friday they were underwriters with a job to do. Very soon they revert to being traders with a different job to do. I think FB left not a red cent on the table. There are different schools of thought on that issue; one of which is a waterlogged issue, as this clearly is, leaves a bad taste and that the company is better off coming at 32.00 and having a better first few weeks. The other school is, of course, TAKE THE MONEY!

    BTW ... why would I have to know what the best price of the day was going to be to buy at 38.01? Good traders leave money on the table all the time. I would know I was going to be out before the close and that the essence of the bet was that the bid would hold on opening day. A good bet.

     
    #187     May 20, 2012
  8. Humpy

    Humpy

    I think we should give Zuckerburg & co a lot of credit for sticking to a pretty wacky idea at the time and making it all the way to the market.

    If I had heard the idea 10 years ago I wouldn't have seen the potential even.

    What interesting things may lie in store for others now blessed with abundant capital. I think someone has already tried to flog off bits of the moon's surface. Mars ??
     
    #188     May 20, 2012
  9. You're going to make money on this IPO



    [​IMG]
     
    #189     May 20, 2012
  10. shorting it?
     
    #190     May 20, 2012