Facebook cancels Australia

Discussion in 'Politics' started by WeToddDid2, Feb 17, 2021.

  1. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    @Here4money @Frederick Foresight @Ricter @userque

    Libtards love their techo fascism. Deplatforming is big corporations against the worker. It is laissez faire capitalism against the average citizen. Deplatforming and banning is all fun and games until people start dying.



     
    #11     Feb 18, 2021
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    #12     Feb 18, 2021
  3. #13     Feb 18, 2021
  4. Nobert

    Nobert

    I like FB's approach, because it's something new and im curious about where it goes.

    Besides, that's kinda cool :

    ,,You don't like our approach, - alright, but then, for us, you cease to exist''
     
    #14     Feb 18, 2021
  5. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    That is exactly how I would expect a techno-fascist to react.
     
    #15     Feb 18, 2021
  6. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    LOL. That is a funny perspective.
     
    #16     Feb 18, 2021
    Nobert likes this.
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    Back at ya.
     
    #17     Feb 18, 2021
  8. userque

    userque

    So-called capitalist who really want to be socialist.

    Facebook is a company, not the government. If you don't like them, use parler, and stop whining.
     
    #18     Feb 18, 2021
    Tony Stark likes this.
  9. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    https://news.trust.org/item/20210218132940-5p461

    EU says copyright laws make situation different from Australia

    Under the EU's tougher copyright rules, online platforms will have to sign licensing agreements with musicians, performers, authors, news publishers and journalists to use their work.

    The European Commission's position is that "press and quality journalism are not for free" so the Copyright Directive creates the condition for fair bargaining between press editors and online platforms. (Reporting by John Chalmers, Editing by Timothy Heritage)
     
    #19     Feb 18, 2021
  10. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    So, you are a techno-fascist. Got it.

    I guess you are as equally okay with the follwing:

    https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/10/...s-regime-change-advocates-monopolize-editing/

    Wikipedia formally censors The Grayzone as regime-change advocates monopolize editing

    On Wikipedia, a small group of regime-change advocates and right-wing Venezuelan opposition supporters have blacklisted independent media outlets like The Grayzone on explicitly political grounds, violating the encyclopedia’s guidelines.
    By Ben Norton
    This is part 1 in a series of investigative reports on the systemic problems with Wikipedia. Read part 2 here: “Meet Wikipedia’s Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundation’s regime-change operative CEO

    Internet encyclopedia giant Wikipedia is censoring independent news websites by adding them to an official blacklist of taboo “deprecated” media outlets.

    The Grayzone is among the news websites targeted by the censorship campaign. Others include leftist and anti-imperialist outlets like MintPress News and the Latin American news broadcaster Telesur, along with several prominent right-wing political sites, including the Daily Caller.

    The campaign to blacklist The Grayzone was initiated by Wikipedia editors who identify as Venezuelans and openly support the country’s right-wing, US-backed opposition. These users obsessively monitor Venezuela-related articles, aggressively pushing a regime-change line and working to excise any piece of information or opinion that interferes with their agenda.

    This online cabal of Venezuelan opposition supporters has been joined by an assortment of neoconservatives who spend countless hours per day, every day of the week, inundating Wikipedia articles with talking points defending Western intervention and demonizing NATO’s Official Enemies.

    Together, this tiny handful of editors has successfully banned Wikipedia from citing The Grayzone, falsely claiming that the website publishes unreliable, false, or fabricated information. In fact, in its more than four years of existence, including its first two years hosted at the website AlterNet (whose use is not forbidden on Wikipedia), The Grayzone has never had to issue a major correction or retract a story.

     
    #20     Feb 18, 2021