"Explosive 9/11" video... can't debunk!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ratboy88, Mar 9, 2007.

What best descibes your stance on whether explosives were used on 9/11?

  1. There were no explosions, now let me watch Fox News a**shole.

    15 vote(s)
    30.0%
  2. Honestly, i dont know or care, did you see britneys new wig?

    7 vote(s)
    14.0%
  3. After watching the video I may have to rethink my previous stupidity.

    4 vote(s)
    8.0%
  4. Anyone that thinks there were no explosives is an idiot!!!

    24 vote(s)
    48.0%
  1. Jesus
     
    #61     Mar 12, 2007

  2. ok.. throw on your depends and give it a shot.
     
    #62     Mar 12, 2007
  3. Ok, you've said again and again that you're after the truth regarding 9/11, right?

    So am I. And when you realize that sometimes the truth isn't what you'd like it to be, one must be willing to admit that. I am willing to admit that your story may be possible, even though I give it zero probability.

    Can you admit that the NIST report about the towers, etc may be possible?
     
    #63     Mar 13, 2007
  4. harmless

    harmless

    well well well

    if it isn't the old gang, the four rascals

    me, haroki, ratboy and Jesus

    ok I will now state the truth about this planet as it is.

    since it won't be accepted as nothing more than crazy, I'll type it out loud.


    all nearby galaxies contain hierarchical groups of ETs,

    one of those have discovered planet earth quite some time ago

    they are actively working to assimilate humanity into their hierarchical collective

    but that means that humanity can not be allowed to develop higher conciseness on their own.

    therefore ET are making sure that enough chaos exists so that eventual restoration will only be done with their help and direction.

    ET control US space program

    ET control overall US long term agenda

    ET plan to bring population numbers down significantly

    ETs love 9/11


    PS: not all ETs are bad
     
    #64     Mar 13, 2007
  5. ok, dont let it go into your head, i was essentialy correct about nist concluding it was a fire driven theory. infact nist had no evidence of any damage to the core, it was all derived from simulations. the report was mainly focused on fireproofing being removed by the impact, experiments with fire; the sagging of trusses and the bucking of central columns under intense heat. i didnt post anymore because of your replies and your taking over of every 911 thread with your moronic debunking.

    The structure responded by redistributing loads previously carried by the damaged
    core columns to other parts of the structure. First, load was transferred to adjacent core columns
    via the core framing. Second, load was transferred from the core to the perimeter by the floor
    system, which directly connected the two. Last, loads were redistributed to intact core and pe-
    rimeter columns via the hat truss. (NIST, 2004, p. 5) Severed or damaged core columns hung
    from the hat truss, acting as tension members that suspended the floors above the impact region.
    The towers remained stable following impact and would collapse only after the fires had had a significant effect on the remaining intact structure.
     
    #65     Mar 13, 2007
  6. And I was right about you being a

    1- Liar

    or

    2- Hypocrite

    or

    3- Moron
     
    #66     Mar 13, 2007
  7. Go have your discussion with I am....

    He's about on your level of insanity
     
    #67     Mar 13, 2007
  8. sorry but your opinion does not mean much to anybody and surely not to me; i rather be associated with all the scientists and high ranking insiders questioning 911 than with a probable failure and inconsequential nobody like u.
     
    #68     Mar 13, 2007
  9. Jesus
     
    #69     Mar 13, 2007
  10. Not my opinion....

    FACT !!
     
    #70     Mar 13, 2007