I was looking at article in regards to Warren's simple investing which he says low-cost index fund. Upon exploring more, the expense ratio makes a big difference. Avg. low cost index fund ER: 0.14 Avg. actively managed index fund ER (mostly struggles to keep with the broader index): 0.75. I wondered what about ETF? here is what i see the ones in my holdings: BOTZ: 0.68 % looks pretty high in the visinity of manage index fund. FIVG: 0.30 % not bad, but still twice as much as avg. low -cost index fund's ER. HACK: 0.60% meeh, also high.
Compared to other ETFs this might seem high. But compared to actively managed funds are these ERs lower.
%% Low + trending lower. SPY/QQQ?? No they still up trending as of 10:07 CST today + yesterdays close. I was refering to all of your exspence ratios.............................................................................,. March,last week may sell off??
If anyone knows some cool etf related to AI, gaming with low expense ratio, pls let other know and post here. The ones I posted here obtained from etrade thematic investing subsite and mostly have relatively high expense ratio (0.60%) Thanks.,
%% OK + as far as profit i would stay away from BOTZ, to many crazy non- logical artificial gaps. Hard to find most any ETF with much more than a 1% fee. Vanguard tends to have lower fees; many brokers have a free ETFs.......................................................................................[00.60 is about average, or low,plenty of money has been made off 5%, even though that is high now. And i've seen some free + low manage fees ETFs=not very liquid ,which is part of BOTZ's problem, but i've seen plenty of 333,000 day volume ETFs that dont trade crazy gaps like BOTZ.