Explain todays massive rally eod

Discussion in 'Trading' started by stock777, Sep 29, 2011.

  1. NoDoji

    NoDoji

    Because you are so earnest in your plea, you have compelled me to come out of hiding for a rare appearance to provide an explanation that will get the entire anti-TA/PA camp in a tizzy:

    FFFSTBO: Failed final flag symmetrical triangle (upper trend line) breakout
     
    #11     Sep 29, 2011
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Holy shit! :D
     
    #12     Sep 29, 2011
  3. Could you pls post that triangle?
     
    #13     Sep 29, 2011
  4. actually I publicly gave out 1135 ES as primary support.

    not surprised at that, since I predicted it. realtime, not the bullshit after the fact crap you guys sling.

    now, the question is, why such a violent swing higher on NO NEWS.

    iyam , its pure bot manipulation.

    <iframe width="960" height="720" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/14pIrRclWTY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #14     Sep 29, 2011
  5. I deployed the 2nd of 100 units at about 15:15 on the road to 1369+ SPX. That's why it rallied. I had to bid it up to get a fill.
     
    #15     Sep 29, 2011
  6. that's too complicated... the core pattern was a lot simpler than that, and likewise inside of that formation.

    By the time descending trendline broke, key pattern confirm from 1139.50 -> 1140.00 ES was already triggered and confirmed.

    But there's nothing wrong with those bar-by-bar entry signals... we front-run them all the time :)
     
    #16     Sep 29, 2011
  7. I do it all the time, right 90%+.

    how about you t&a genii posting something before the fact instead of 10,000 words after fact on how obvious it all was and how you had it as usual.

    bet you cant do it, cause you're fos
     
    #17     Sep 29, 2011
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Riiiiiiiiiiight
     
    #18     Sep 29, 2011
  9. ps, Im sure you caught my 1150 call yest when we were at 1158. spiked all the way down to 1144 where I covered in realtime.
     
    #19     Sep 29, 2011
  10. Is it possible to cover in non realtime?
     
    #20     Sep 29, 2011