Ok, he's against bailing out home buyers who were dumb, irresponsible, greedy, et cetera. Okay, I get that point of view, philosophy, the Ayn Rand thing. But how can he support using taxpayer dollars to "beef up" (euphemism for bail out) regional banks? To simpify, he thinks it's okay to take my money and give it to an irresponsible bank but not to an irresponsible home owner? I mean the guy is smart about the bond market and all that, but I just don't get the philosophical consistency of his arguments, and makes me wonder if it's just anti-populist class prejudice.