Now, a report from ProPublica shows that Bharara was leading an investigation into stock trades made by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. As a member of Congress, Price traded hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of shares from companies in the health industry, while at the same time sponsoring legislation having to do with the health industry. Bharara was also reportedly investigating Fox News for its handling of financial settlements paid to women who accused former Fox News Chief Roger Ailes of sexual harassment. http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/03/18/bharara-trump-cabinet/
as I said he serves at the pleasure of the new president. If the new President calls around firing time and you wish to keep your job... you should probably call him back. if the president goes into and improper area... be a man and say something or resign. You are a fool if you don't call the President of the United States back. If you are really concerned... start the conversation off with ground rules. come on this faggot excuse does not pass the smell test.
Trump already has a strong case for the most corrupt administration in history imo,and he hasn't even been in office for 6 months
Just wait til his secretary of states gets 150 million from russia for uranium. I bet comey and preet will be all over that.
Trump already asked him to stay on and Bharara accepted,there was nothing more for Trump and Bharara to discuss one on one especially with Bharara investigating a member of Trumps cabinet and Trumps favorite media outlet Fox News.
You are aware that Russia didn't get any US uranium right? I'm sure you're also aware 11 state and federal agencies approved the sale,not just the State Dept.
For the crowd that keeps asking for 'evidence', you guys sure like to repeat falsehoods without any evidence at every opportunity http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...ll-hillary-sold-out-us-interests-putin-regime ... While CFIUS evaluated Rosatom’s offer, Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer observed, “a spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One” began. “These Canadian mining magnates decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.” These included Uranium One’s then-chairman, Ian Telfer, whose donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (CGSGI) totaled $3.1 million. Giustra himself gave $131.3 million to the Clinton Foundation. Before, during, and after CFIUS’s review, Schweizer calculates, “shareholders involved in this transaction had transferred approximately $145 million to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives.” Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...ll-hillary-sold-out-us-interests-putin-regime
in the past I posted articles questioning your statement saying it liked uranium had left the country.
May want to read the snopes article "Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state. " How can he be a shareholder if he didn't have any shares?