Ex-Hawaii official denounces 'ludicrous' birther claims.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Free Thinker, Apr 11, 2011.

  1. Holding no faith, what a riot.

    Like someone holding darkness...

    How bloody silly...

    Stick with the turnip defense, it makes more sense than your denying your own faith.

     
    #121     Apr 18, 2011
  2. stu

    stu

    Yea well you are bloody silly.
    I can't help the skewed and limited simplistic turnip thinking religion has evidently lumbered you with.
    That's your problem.
     
    #122     Apr 18, 2011
  3. Yea, well you are bloody silly +1.

    I can't help the dishonest and denial driven minded atheists...
    atheism has evidently lumbered up the side of your brain.
    That's your problem.


     
    #123     Apr 18, 2011
  4. stu

    stu

    The thread wasn't morphed into to God and faith, but merely used the whole subject of religion in one straightforward comparison.

    Then you of course had to go ballistic and jump in with both feet going totally off topic spouting about your faith and Jesus.

    You could have just explained why you need no proof at all for totally ridiculous religious claims, yet demand absolute proof for a Presidents birth even though there are legal documents for that anyway.

    But of course like all religious protagonists, you can never be wrong about these things.
     
    #124     Apr 18, 2011
  5. stu

    stu

    No substance so you get all ad hom and personal.
    Par for the course
     
    #125     Apr 18, 2011
  6. jem

    jem

    you are a zealout.

    I was giving examples of the difference between faith and fact. that is not proselytizing and a completely called for response... once your atheist buddy took the thread off target. the ad hom morphing came from an atheist, not me, making you the liar.

    Note... the fanciful atheist demands proof the metaphysical... to admit there might be a God.

    But thinks a digital copy found on the internet... counts as proof of natural born citizenship...

    even though the president has not said it is his and its accurate
    it is not the best document
    it is not an original (which could be had from the source)
    and the U.S. supreme court has not stated the definition of natural born citizen.
    stu you have compromised your intellect to such a degree you are no longer worthy of response.
     
    #126     Apr 18, 2011
  7. Just returning your serve.

    Anytime you want to seriously, honestly, and openly discuss the issues, well that would be a first time for you...but I am open to reasonable discussion.

    If all you want to do is sling, right back at you...

     
    #127     Apr 18, 2011
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Huh? You presume too much.

    Like these?
     
    #128     Apr 19, 2011
  9. Savant

    Savant

    I don't know nearly all there is to know about this whole 'birther' issue. What I do know is that there would be one very simple and decisive way to settle it: produce the birth certificate. If he thinks it wont come up during the election, he's hitting the pipe (again).

    <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nwgD-8Bj_Qs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #129     Apr 19, 2011
  10. stu

    stu

    What's your point?
    Parsing out my responses to OptionalZZzzz revilements against me, is nothing different from the sniping I'm saying is all you're indulging in anyway.
     
    #130     Apr 19, 2011