LOL. That's true. The only one I'm aware of on this board who has changed affiliations on anything is CaptainOblivious and even that change took place because of external forces.
more amorphous b.s. --- "in a natural process" is code for STU is full of shit and does not know, understand or have a pathway.
I was very rational. I illustrated your fraud. You have no proof non life became life "in a natural process." That is the entire fricken issue we have been discussing. Nobel prize winners would not be proposing directed evolution or pan spermia if they had proof non life became life in a natural process here on earth. You could not be a bigger fraud.
So life becomes life 'in an unnatural process' !!? Do you even bother to think what youâre saying at all. Wholly natural origin of life originating on earth, jointly or separtely originating through wholly natural panspermia. It could be both or either. Just shows how little you understand about this. So come on why are you avoiding the question. Why so anti life from non life? Threatens your beliefs too much the only reason?
If you wish to have faith in random chance over directed evolution or some other option, that is fine with me. Just understand you have been spouting faith not science.
Is this thread still going? So much for 1 paragraph. Insanity: posting the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.