Woo.... you're always so touchy. Abiogenesis, universes from nothing, are based upon hard science. Just what is your objection to that which makes your open minded abuse so quick to surface?
You're projecting Lord stewie, I have a skin as thick as anyone here and thicker than most. They're either unproven unobserved or about as plausible as creationism. Some or all may be fact/true. When I'm satisfied they are I'll embrace them with open arms. Until then I'm skeptical. You want to keep banging your head against the wall until then go right ahead.
No He hasn't. Where is He? Have you ever had a conversation with God? All you have are ancient manuscripts whose authenticity is questionable at best.
There is actually tons of $ behind evolution. The Smithsonian's reason to exist is to SELL evolution. People like that are not interested in a healthy debate. Universities are heavily invested in evolution, it makes them the experts and leaders. They very muchly will not hire anybody that does not have their belief system. The Creation side is not funded and they don't own any of the accepted venues for the debate so the "science" side always will win. They, nonstop 24/7, frame the debate as "science" vs "blind faith" and they can get away with ignoring all scientific objections to their belief system so they can get away with everything [right up to the day they die]. Insults are almost their first line of defense for a good reason!! That obviates why Jesus said that seekers will find truth. The world will have it's prepackaged stuff for impressionable children always, it always has. A person has to forage around to even find the debate that supports Creation!!
what is it with you bible thumpers? why are you all afraid? i realize it a effective tactic of religions using the carrot and the stick approach but i sure wouldnt want to live my life afraid of an invisible man in the sky? Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man -- living in the sky -- who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do.. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever 'til the end of time! ..But He loves you. written by George Carlin
I suggest you stop distorting science and its findings... and accept the fact science does not support your view that there is no God. Science is agnostic on the question of a creator, when you accept that you will be able to stop trolling.
why don't you explain the hard science of universes from nothing. Universes from nothing is accepted because science can not really say what caused the big bang. And know Hawking following in Susskind's step proposes the speculation of a multiverse... by hard science... not. It is speculation.
by the way stu here is where you were dead ass wrong said there is plenty of science for non life to life. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...62&perpage=6&highlight=pathway&pagenumber=124 surely you don't claim there is proof of abiogenesis or are you going to play change the definition of words again.
When a creationist can't win the scientific debate, always frame the debate as a conspiracy of scientists using evolution to destroy religious faith. Should a geologist have a debate with someone who believes the earth is flat?