What's really sad is you desperately stumbling over yourself with STUpidity like this in support of your atheist beliefs http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3238040#post3238040
I just gave you a paper from MIT which sums everything up and you still write this shit? you stated you have proof that non life became life on earth... that paper just summed up the last few decades of research on the subject. try educating yourself and stop being such a troll. you were wrong... its okay we still think the same way of you.
I'm not suggesting the possibility of that sort of universe/god. If I were the first thing I'd point out is that your statement can be fairly converted to an arbitrary definition:"A real universe is one in which pregnancy can't be magical.". Even if you're careful with your definitions you may find untenable arguing that in all possible worlds reality necessarily disallows magic of any kind including magical pregnancy.
Hey Hansel, nice to hear from you after so long. Would you please be good enough to read again what I said before re-interpreting my words to say something they don't. If the universe is everything we call god then what we call god is included in the universe. No. The universe is everything you call god, then what you call god is actually the universe.
You're still squirming. No change there. The fundamental single undivided FACT is that all of life's building blocks, the necessities of life, can come and do occur from inorganic material. You can cut & paste all the papers you want to do with showing, speculating, theorizing, scientifically explaining how that could have happened,as you continually try to misrepresent the actual situation, that's a different issue altogether. But you cannot squeeze your God in the place where nature already managed to produce the essentials for 'life from non-life' all by itself.
I hope everyone is smart enough to see what a troll you are. building blocks - are not what makes things alive. Of course life has core components... that proves nothing. you are just using words to change the focus. frankenstein was a body until mary shelly animated him. you have building blocks, but you have no proof of a pathway of those inorganic materials evolving into life. you said you have proof of life from no life. there is not a single credible scientist in the world who makes that statement. In fact if you read the MIT article you see that few or no scientists believe they have proof that the inorganic materials turned into life by chance. And some rule out chance. its you vs. science. that is the issue you say not only that life evolved from inorganic materials by chance, but you say you have proof. You are a fool and your prove it with every post on this thread.