Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

Which is the basis of 2 & 20.

 

What is it with you ET's angry religious brigade that you can only repeat the same argument after a full explanation has already been given for why you're wrong.

"What can be said with certainty about God and falsifiability is: if God does exist it can't be proven God doesn't exist and, if God doesn't exist it can't proven God does exist."

The same goes for Russell's Teapot. If it does exist you'll never find it, if it doesn't exist it's still unfalsifiable.

Equally implausible and equally unfalsifiable as God.

 

To be honest, I am not grateful to that guy, or the megalomaniac judge who's supposed to be that guy's dad, for the trumped up charge. I don't accept that sort of immorality in the first place.

So no, I wouldn't want to even trust let alone keep any laws set up under such psychotic an arrangement.

 

Fuck God. There, I said it.

 

Not when they’re based on the scientific method as observable phenomena .
The words for that are rational and objective.

The description for an unknown indescribable level of absolute all knowing is, I’m told, "meta".
But then as they say, it takes all sorts.

 

1. "God is, or He is not"
2. A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up.
3. According to reason, you can defend neither of the propositions.
4. You must wager. It is not optional.
5. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing.
6. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force, when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain.


What does he mean when he says "If you gain, you gain all;" That statement is not backed up by anything.

 

that's the problem. the assumption is that if one believes in God then God rewards this. But what if it is the other way around: you get punished by God for believing in Him? There is no way of knowing what's in His head (or even if he has one).

 

I think most atheists don't believe in hell because there is nothing to indicate such a place exists.

 

So the Christian faith is basically one giant after-life insurance policy. What a wonderful excuse to surrender one's own logic and reason.

 

That's my point actually, people believe what they want to believe.