you are a loon... what info did you provide which supports you thesis. What is your thesis, you are just basically against science. you produced a video which says evolution has nothing to do with the the evolution of non life to life. We agree, you proved my point.
Who cares that he was concerned about publishing. Its not like the bible says the earth is only 6000 years old. My question was made because until recently the et atheists acted like they knew life evolved from non life and it seems to me that like et's atheists... darwin seems to stand for different things to different people. My thesis is that it is et's atheists who do not accept the current understandings of science. I really do not care about fundamentalist's ideas about creation because half the stuff they say is not in the bible. The bible should be judged by what is in the bible and et's atheists should be judged by what science says.
When you get anything that even looks like a reasonable argument rather than just infantile insult let me know.
You can make any unsound, uncorroborated statement, and <strike>often</strike> always do. Science is not to do with atheism or theism, it's to do with science you goof.
This from the lying ignoramus who "thinks" the 96% part of the universe we have no clue about is the part that we do (barely) understand, and who "believes" unfalsifiability means implausibility.
In my defense I'm not a scientist. My theory and conclusion is based on real time first hand observation though. Which is a lot more than I can say for some of your beloved theories.
As long as you imagine gratuitous insult is all thatâs needed for your argument, youâll remain just as wrong as you ever were.
In your defense you've made it clear that like a creationist or a flat earther, you come to a point where it is found necessary to be anti-science, which seems to strangely validate some other personal conclusions.