Speaking of "false equivalency," humans not being able to disprove the existence of these at a given point in time absolutely does NOT make them equally likely to exist or not. Do you not already get that? Hypocrisy much?
But why would we ditch a quality which was so beneficial? You are "one offing" this, as if it is inconsequential. What do you think would happen to a bird, if one day they mutated and lacked the wings to fly? Would they just continue to live and evolve that way? There is tons of examples in evolution where animals lost qualities that would have been beneficial, or gained qualities which would have been detrimental. Natural selection doesnt explain everything.
I said the thread is about evolution and in fact the title is "Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph." Sex is a subtopic of that. Is inbreeding a family tradition?
I thought i made myself very clear in this thread that i dont believe in a god based on an organised religion. I simply believe that there are gigantic holes in science which we can not explain. And i do not dismiss the fact that there could be something bigger than us out there which we can not explain.
Pick up a college biology textbook and study it for about a year. All the holes will be explained to you in detail beyond reasonable doubt. It just takes time and effort to understand these things. Mental capacity helps, but you're a trader, you should have that already.
Again. Wow. If you were genuine, you would have made an earnest effort to learn about the topic by now. I applaud the patience of the people on here who have been humoring you.
you really do not understand the science do you.... the stats are overwhelmingly impossible against life forming on earth from non life, by chance. Do you want the quotes again... do you understand why Dr. Crick the nobel prize winning DNA guy suggested that maybe life got here via pan spermia. The best guess is that it would take something like the perfect timing and alignment of 250 substances (read variables) to form that first cell. the idea of that happening by chance is trillions and trillions and trillions to one. There has not been enough time to take the chances and there was probably not enough substance on the earth to allow the chances.... its almost folly to suggest it happened by chance. thats the science.... One noble prize winners said that its this absurd.... it would be like expecting a golf ball to play a golf course at par by random chance just because a golfer could play the course at par.