Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, Jun 19, 2011.

  1. You obviously haven't. You just parrot things you've read but clearly don't understand.
     
    #131     Jun 29, 2011
  2. #132     Jun 29, 2011
  3. stu

    stu

    Clearly you are still very angry and upset about my response to some clumsy remarks you made quite a while ago.
    Attacking me, childish name calling, and lashing out at science won't pretend magic your mistakes away.
     
    #133     Jun 29, 2011
  4. Oh please. I caught you red handed in that post and anyone who reads it will see that not only are you a science illiterate, you're a liar for trying to lie your way out of it now.
     
    #134     Jun 29, 2011
  5. Your first lie (which I captured in my last reply) didn't sound plausible enough so you changed it to another? You're a total joke! :p
     
    #135     Jun 29, 2011
  6. stu

    stu

    You're still getting nowhere lashing out with the same nonsense.

    What's your point? You make some incorrect non scientific remarks, then shout "science is wrong" , stay angry about it for months ..... for what?
    Is it to make religion correct to you in some weird way?
     
    #136     Jun 29, 2011
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Prejudice against what? Fantastical unproven theories? Then yes it probably is.
     
    #137     Jun 29, 2011
  8. Except that the "fantastical theories" regarding evolution have all manner of corroborating evidence, back and forth, regarding dating and speciation, which is added to almost daily across the globe, whereas the principal alternative is a "theory" favored by tribesmen from the Bronze Age and involves a sky father.
     
    #138     Jun 29, 2011
  9. Keep digging. You've been totally discredited and your continued lies and obfuscations only make you look STUpider and STUpider :p
     
    #139     Jun 29, 2011
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Do you ever let your unproven theories stand on their own merit or do you always compare them to religion as if it's either or?

    YES! there is corroborating "evidence" (subject to interpretation) but that doesn't change the fact that it's still unproven or make some of those theories any less fantastical. Unless of course you're unaccustomed to thinking for yourself.
     
    #140     Jun 29, 2011