Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, Jun 19, 2011.

  1. Why not?

    Again, tell us specifically which "extremeophiles" [sic] are known to live in an environment where the temperature is -454 degrees F.
     
    #1161     Sep 15, 2011
  2. stu

    stu

    Why not?
    Because it is irrelevant.
    If it were the only temperature in outer space then...whatever... but it isn't .

    So 'tell us specifically', what are you grasping at?
     
    #1162     Sep 15, 2011
  3. jem

    jem

    1. Saying you know there is no God takes as much faith as saying there is a God.

    2. Regarding Crick. I agree, and I was waiting for you to contradict your feeble philosophy argument. You are now quoting what you previously discounted as philosophy. you are such a troll.

    3. If you wish to talk about philosophy, you're argument is about the hope that science will someday observe or prove that life came from non life. That philosophy understands that if it were have happened on earth... it would have been highly unlikely to have done so given what science understands now.

    There is no scientific evidence, at this time, showing life came from non life here on earth.

    You have been full of shit this whole time... and you do not stop.

    So once again... I point out your fraud by saying show us your plenty of science showing life came from non life. Not your speculation, not your philosophy.
     
    #1163     Sep 15, 2011
  4. Oh please... you can't even spell "extremophile" let alone intelligently discuss them. That's not the only temperature in outer space but that's the temp of the vast majority of it which is far colder than the habitat of any known extremophile. So once again you have proved your STUpidity and once again you've tried to lie and obfuscate your way out of it like the troll you are.
     
    #1164     Sep 15, 2011
  5. jem

    jem

    stus quote

    "
    Abiogenesis contains proven science and research and is established. Because you won't acknowledge it, doesn't change the fact one iota.f abiogensis. "

    Note this is just like the fraud he is playing with his statement about plenty of science showing life coming from non life.


    Instead of saying abiogenesis is proven science... The king of bullshit and zealous defense of atheism on ET states abiogenesis "contains" proven science.

    that is how stu rolls.
     
    #1165     Sep 15, 2011
  6. stu

    stu

    Yes you are a troll, but that won't stop me acknowledging a mistake.
    My bad, one too many e's in extremophile. Love you Trader.

    Damn it. Now I spelt fuck wrong too.


    There are vast areas of outer space which are not far colder than it is known these organisms could survive in.
    So what exactly IS your point, apart from making the usual infantile and false accusations, which indicate you intend to hold nothing like an intelligent discussion?
     
    #1166     Sep 15, 2011
  7. stu

    stu

    It takes no faith to say there is no Santa. It takes no faith to say there is no God
    I do know the altogether imaginary and the non-existent look very much the same.

    Troll yourself.
    I honestly wonder what you must be on. Your cut & paste is still philosophy and not science as you were trying to push it to be whether I quote it or not. wtf?

    There is plenty of science which you have been made aware of by this thread alone, that you've chosen to deny and ignore, but which shows how life can come from non life. It is not philosophy you loon.

    You just said you agree the person suggesting in his opinion, it would have been highly unlikely life had time to evolve from non life, changed his position on scientific evidence.

    Instead of accusing me of contradiction, in your confusion you would have been accurate in directing it to yourself.


    Let's face it you are determined to be thoroughly dishonest throughout. It won't work.

    There is plenty of science showing how life can come from non life. Seriously, get over the fact. Perhaps by first practicing how to say it without changing the wording.
     
    #1167     Sep 15, 2011
  8. stu

    stu

    It is a correct and factual statement to make. Abiogenesis contains proven science and research. It is an established branch of science. Why the hell should it be said any differently.

    As a Creationist you have sweet fuck all to offer in place of that science, so you can only think to act like a child, making infantile assertions, pushing false conclusions, making cantankerous accusations, generally being anti science, as if you imagine that is being at all intelligent.
     
    #1168     Sep 15, 2011
  9. Like the lying troll you are, you're trying to back pedal after realizing you've been smacked down yet again. Your original quote (in the pic below) was about environments extremophiles LIVE in, not survive in.

    The temperature of the universe is a little less than -454 degrees F. And the lowest recorded temperature for active microbial communities is about 0 F, so now tell me how "vast" warm areas are, relatively speaking, you moron. Once again you've proved your ignorance and STUpidity. :p

    Google "psychrophile" and educate yourself instead of spewing nonsense and trolling.

    [​IMG]
     
    #1169     Sep 15, 2011
  10. #1170     Sep 15, 2011