Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

No, like YOUR hypothesis that there IS one. You can't prove a negative. However, YOU'RE the one with the affirmative assertion, therefore, the onus is on you. The person rejecting an assertion does not need to bring anything to the table. It is the asserter who has to show his homework.

On the other hand, the affirmative assertion of evolution has all manner of evidence supporting it. Evolution does not require a god, therefore, one is not asserted.

Once again, you have the answer without even understanding the question.

 

Wrong again. Some negatives can absolutely be proven. Your "knowledge" of logic is severely lacking.

Weak attempt at obfuscating your way out of your earlier gaffe but do you "think" the nonexistence of God is "completely unfalsifiable" or not? Yes or no? If you say yes, then based on your "logic" below it does in fact follow that it's "as weak a hypothesis as you can get."

A hypothesis is as weak as it is unfalsifiable. The god argument is completely unfalsifiable, therefore, from a thinking person's perspective it is as weak a hypothesis as you can get.

 

Hey, TGregg, doesn't it make you feel warm all over that Trader666 is one of yours, and that there are so many more just like him? (Politically speaking.)

 

I share many of your views on marketsurfer, so what does that mean?

 

That you're "evolving?" Be patient. These things take time.

 

It means he has zero understanding of logic so must resort to trolling.

 

The important thing is that your grasp of "logic" is what has brought you, and so many others just like you, to the Right side of the political aisle. It says so much.

 

I thought we were all evolving.

Admittedly I've never been impressed with Gabby's "logic".

 

I rest my case.

P.S. Tell us again how "you can't prove a negative." Or how your "concept" of falsifiability only applies to what you want it to

 

i no longer understand the arguments of people like gabfly.

if you are saying that you are now now confining your argument to the argument that once life appeared... life evolved somewhat..

no arguments from me. that is my position too.

Just don't pretend that you have scientific proof for your argument that life evolved from non life here on earth.

as for the evolutionists selective quote mining from darwin... I do not get you argument.... what is it that you say darwin stands for?

finally - I am not sure why anyone would quote dawkins... he has admitted the universe and life could have been created