Evolution - A Weak Argument for the Anti-Supernatural?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ShoeshineBoy, Nov 27, 2007.

  1. And consider this:

    http://www.junkscience.com/news/kasparov.html

    Here is a guy who is willing to admit that Kasparov's brain is downright scary. When Kasparov faced up against Big Blue he was facing "a 2,800 pound IBM RS/6000 SP supercomputer rigged with more than 500 microprocessors capable of analyzing about 200 million chess positions every second." Kasparov dang near beat this thing.

    Now how did that kind of incredible computing power occur in just a few million years? And, again, why? Why competitive advantage does a human being get from being super-intelligent? Not much really.

    Or could it be that he needed to be super-intelligent to understand the things of God?

    This old thread of Nitro's btw discusses the movie if anyone is interested:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...ge=6&highlight=kasparov big blue&pagenumber=5
     
    #11     Nov 27, 2007
  2. It's clear that you have no clue what evolution is. Go read Darwin then we can discuss.

    BTW, the human brain didn't evolve from vacuum in a few million years. It evolved from a monkey brain, which was already far superior than any machine we can build today, if survival was the metric.
     
    #12     Nov 27, 2007
  3. This is truly laughable. If humans developed a "super intelligent" brain to understand the things of God, why do you think humans developed masturbation skills? To understand pornography?
     
    #13     Nov 27, 2007
  4. What can die was never alive.

    This world is the picture of attack by everything on everything.

    It is not a "Christian" world. And my kingdom has nothing to do with it.

    What seems to be "alive", and what is called "life" is an illusion.

    Just because something walks around on two or four legs does not mean it is alive as God creates life.

    Nothing that God creates dies, ever, for any reason.

    For that matter, nothing he creates ever changes.

    Jesus
     
    #14     Nov 27, 2007
  5. Good lord, I didn't know that "nothing" was created by God...
     
    #15     Nov 27, 2007
  6. "why do you think humans developed masturbation skills?"

    Only a statement as ridiculous as this could come from the "scientific" minded.

    Oh my goodness, that's a great skill set you got working for you there...no doubt you work hard and long on perfecting that skill set. Something you are likely very proud of...

    An instinctual drive is considered a skill set by a "scientific" minded person?

    ROTFLMAO...

    http://pagankinktress.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/wanking-habits-amongst-the-animal-kingdom/

     
    #16     Nov 27, 2007
  7. Masturbation is optional so I have no idea what your'e getting at that there. So let's talk about sex I guess: sex is essential for reproduction. What wouldn't that be inevitable?

    I think what you're missing is that, in the case of the universe, it is remarkable that it is self-organizing. It is similar with evolution on planet earth...
     
    #17     Nov 27, 2007
  8. Masturbation is optional so I have no idea what your'e getting at that there. So let's talk about sex I guess: sex is essential for reproduction. What wouldn't that be inevitable?

    I think what you're missing is that, in the case of the universe, it is remarkable that it is self-organizing. It is similar with evolution on planet earth...
     
    #18     Nov 27, 2007
  9. Ah, that's so much better. No sense in hiding behind a new pseudonym after you've been "outed." Welcome back.
     
    #19     Nov 27, 2007
  10. False accusations seem to be the way of the "scientific" mind as one wanker attempts to defend another...

     
    #20     Nov 27, 2007