Kremlin disavows knowledge of lawyer-Trump staff meeting http://www.wral.com/trump-s-son-changed-account-of-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/16810395/ "The Kremlin, meanwhile, is disavowing knowledge of the Russian lawyer, or any meeting between Trump senior staff and the woman."
To date the only real proof of collusion was between the Clinton campaign, the media, and the DNC to rig the primaries. Still no hard evidence of Trump collusion. Only wild eyed speculation and conjecture.
In January this year, when Vice President Mike Pence was asked whether any Trump adviser or member of the campaign had contact with the Russians who were trying to meddle in the election, Pence said: “Of course not.” http://www.newsweek.com/trump-son-donald-trump-jr-russian-lawyer-634036
Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Jr. meeting with a Russian lawyer to discuss adoptions of Russian children to the U.S. is not "contact with the Russians who were trying to meddle in the election". It appears that statement claiming that Jared and Donald Jr. were meeting with a Russian lawyer claiming to have information on the Hillary campaign is turning out to be fake news. It appears the Times' story which claims to cite advisers to the White House who were briefed on the discussion is partially fabricated.
Which was just a pre-text to set up the meeting he stated - no information about Clinton was available. It appears that the Time failed, once again, to fully quote what a person said and simply took the few words they wanted out of context.
You may have missed the law, simply taking the meeting is ILLEGAL because it would be an offer of an in-kind donation to Trump's campaign, read up on the law I posted earlier. And Times failed about what? What was taken out of context, be specific.