Evidence of Collusion

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Jul 9, 2017.

  1. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    The 9th Circus? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
     
    #271     Jul 16, 2017
    gwb-trading likes this.
  2. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    At least your legal arguments are better than the lawyers Trump has been hiring.
     
    #272     Jul 16, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  3. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Finally, MSM asked a dem about DNC's collusion with Ukraine. Schiff does not deny it in the video and in fact states that it would be inappropriate. He just says that the scale is different.

     
    #273     Jul 19, 2017
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Hillary colluded? Got any EVIDENCE? Oh, some Ukrainian researcher PUBLICLY requested a meeting at an embassy - that's collusion? LMFAO
     
    #274     Jul 19, 2017
  5. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    We never met with Russians

    Ok, we did

    But it was only two people talking about adoptions.

    Ok, it wasn't adoption and there were 8 of us

    One of them was an counterintel op, the other accused of money laundering for the Russian mob

    but we didn't collude.

    Ok, we did but who cares?

    Anyone would have done it!

    But HILLARY!
     
    #275     Jul 19, 2017
  6. jem

    jem

    did you read that hack job.


    "And to the extent that the Trump campaign aided, abetted or advised the Russians (or any other hackers) about what would be most useful to steal from the Democrats or how best to enhance the impact of their release, they may well have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act."

    that sentence could apply to anyone... its like saying "to the extent ____ plunged a knife into the dead person's back they may have violated CA Penal Code 187. "



     
    #276     Jul 19, 2017
  7. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    It only applies to those who had secret meetings with Russians - meetings where the purpose was to get 'dirt', who lied about the meeting and then lied about what happened at the meeting.
     
    #277     Jul 19, 2017
  8. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark



    I loved the argument trumps lawyer made about the meeting being ok because The Secret Service wouldn't have approved shady characters around Fredo,Than The Secret Service shot back that Fredo was not under SS protection and the meeting wasn't vetted by The SS lol
     
    #278     Jul 19, 2017
    Frederick Foresight likes this.
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Doesn't matter, Trump supporters only hear the questions, they never listen to the fact checks because that's the real 'fake news'
     
    #279     Jul 19, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  10. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

     
    #280     Jul 19, 2017