Oh, so there was a guilty verdict for the murder trial? What is your point? Do you just post randomly? OJ was a running back.
My point is that lawyers are scum, if they are being paid or have a reason to say something (in this case Trump being pro-Israel, anti-Iran, pro-netanyahu) they will say anything, support any criminal, twist any laws. Better to look for legal opinion that's more neutral.
You mean legal opinions that agree with your and the Democrat's narrative? You posting that Don jr simply meeting an attorney from Russia in which nothing happened is illegal is simply not the case. It is what you hope is the case.
Taking the meeting KNOWING that it was a government attorney, 'loving it' knowing Russian government is providing the help is against the law. Krauthammer said it best “If you get a call to go to a certain place in the middle of the night to pick up stolen goods and it turns out the stolen goods don’t show up but the cops show up,” he noted. “I think you’re going to have a very weak story saying, ‘Well, I got swindled here.'” http://www.mediaite.com/online/krau...e-to-say-your-collusion-might-be-incompetent/ Krauthammer is a Dem now? He is also a trained lawyer by the way and is in no way a Democrat narrative guy.
What law? There is no law that states you cannot get information from a foreign source. It is not against the law as Dershowitz clearly explains. What was stolen? There was no law that was broken. You didn't listen to the video. Listen to the video. Dershowitz makes a great argument.
Do you really think that HRC's campaign wasn't contacting foreign entities and people trying to dig up info on Trump? You cannot be that naive.
@exGOPer Is it starting to sink in even after all of the liberal propaganda that you have been incessantly regurgitating?