Evidence of Collusion

That's funny coming from people who post fake peer reviewed article to push a narrative.

 

Funny that is coming from someone who claims that every peer reviewed article that does not support your perspective is "fake".

 

You missed the part where you showed the paper was actually peer reviewed. Hint: It wasn't or you won't need a wordpress link to cite it.

 

Were you triggered? You usually don't use profanity in your post.

Well, I was triggered by your insensitive racist use of the gender word "guys".

You must be from Cali.

 

Feel free to go to a site where you pay for the full paper if you don't like the wordpress version.

 

I respond to posts accordingly, if there are personal attacks then I respond kindly otherwise I try to keep things civil.

I am not some SJW who cares about insenstivity, use what you like.

 

I will, just link me to the peer review journal where I can pay for this 'peer reviewed' paper.

 

It is terrible that they scammed you and others.

 

Seventeen Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter on Wednesday to the Justice Department demanding answers as to why the agency abruptly dismissed a money-laundering case earlier this year involving the Kremlin-linked attorney who met with Donald Trump Jr. during last year's campaign.

In May, the Department of Justice (DOJ) settled United States v. Prevezon Holdings Ltd., a $230 million fraud and money-laundering case that accused Prevezon Holdings executives of fraudulently obtaining a tax refund from the Russian treasury.

In the case, Prevezon was represented by Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian attorney who met with Trump Jr. during the campaign after promising incriminating information on Hillary Clinton

The Justice Department settled the case two days before trial for just $6 million. The letter, which was posted on Twitter Wednesday afternoon, demands to know whether the two events are connected.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-know-why-doj-dismissed-money-laundering-case