http://seekingalpha.com/article/115290-what-can-we-learn-from-the-1930s?source=article_sb_picks The questions now are.... 1) How much more ? 2) Would it have been better for the Fed just to give every man, woman, and child $24, 000....and more ? 3) Is the $24,000 just an added cost....or an investment that will return more than $24,000 ? The real question is how can $7 Trillion replace $50 Trillion ? The keypoint being valuations being in individual names versus government names in the future.... Why reward losing banks ? Why not reward winning banks ? Why not reward those entitities that have the best chance of returning the $50 Trillion lost ?....In the shortest period of time ?