he aint heavy and he aint my bro.. the idiot debates with a logic primer in his lap.. axe is pathetic. what a looser(sic).
Strawman fallacy. I didnt say ANY witnesses word on ANY subject would not qualify as evidence. Im talking about the instance we are discussing. Someones "WORD" implying that someone else has supernatural clairvoyant powers would NOT hold up in any court of law. peace axeman
Axe: >Im not preventing anyone from posting >their experiences. ...{snip} Shoe:L >Yes, you are. {snip} He is? JB
Yes I argue with logic.... which actually requires a brain. LongDip on the other hand, argues with the LACK of a brain. He is incapable of comprehending basic logic. Of all the people on ET, LongDip needs the logic primer more than anyone But the real pathetic part is.... he follows me around ET like some psychotic stalker ex girlfriend who "just cant let go". LMAOOOOOOOO His ego was so completely shattered in previous debates with me that he can only lash out with personal attacks everywhere I go. Sad....really sad. Get help dude. But what can you expect from a severe alcoholic like longshot? peace axeman
hear we go. hear we go.. as it shrieks: "STRAW MAN! STRAW MAN!" LMAO right on cue. you pathetic brain dead at birth retard dont you realize how stupid you sound not to mention extremely ANAL! :-\
Longshot clearly has a problem with the identification of fallacious arguments because he is so guilty of committing them himself. I catch longshot in so many fallacies, all he can do is mock and taunt me for shooting his bad arguments down left and right Thats right longdip....it IS a strawman. Get over it. Calling them as I see em Maybe if you grew 2 or 3 more brain cells you would be able to identify them as well What moron. Back to the bottle Longdip. Go drink yourself asleep and stop crapping all over this thread with a flame war you IDIOT peace axeman
Alright, looks like we came to the end of the debate. First Axe insists that the stories are flawed. Then when stories are brought up that don't hvae flaws, then it's the people who told the stories who can't be believed. Obviously, Axe will never accept proof, cause whatever proof will be brought, Axe will find a reason why it's not proof. (although I'm not sure some of the bizarre stuff Axe has been writing here can be described as "reasons"). This reminds me of the first conference by bible code critics several years back. During her speech, one of the organisers, a mathematician, said the following "bible codes CANNOT be real", and why? "Because if the codes were real, then that would mean that the bible is divine". Without getting into whether the codes are real or not, that really says it all, doesn't it? People like that mathematician (or Axe) will never LET themselves be convinced, because that wouldn't fit with their view of the world... Goodnight all, I'm off to discuss things with people who are actually willing to listen honestly...
you won't find the "messy" truth in a logic primer you total freaking ass clown... logic is a tool not the end all be all.. haha but you will never understand this.. the truth does not exist in "STRAW MAN! STRAW MAN!" hahha is why i laugh at you almost every day now.. i am sure others feel the same; YOU OUR ASS CLOWN
Wow... thats pretty funny stuff. You claim the stories are flawless? For example: The story you told about visiting the rabbi and the girl suddenly getting sick ISNT flawed? You are drawing a conclusion based on a SINGLE DATA POINT and your claiming its flawless? "Obviously, Axe will never accept proof, cause whatever proof will be brought, Axe will find a reason why it's not proof" Obviously? I see.... so because you have FAILED to provide anything that remotely qualifies as "proof", you must know commit the poisoning the well fallacy, and simply claim I will reject everything because I will find a reason why its not proof?? Did you ever consider the possibility that my reasons are VALID??? Why dont you try and argue the point instead of running away?? " (although I'm not sure some of the bizarre stuff Axe has been writing here can be described as "reasons")." An empty claim. Care to quote something I said that is bizarre??? For example?? Or is this simply a covert way of attacking your opponent? "This reminds me of the first conference by bible code critics several years back" Ummmm.... a poor analogy. Since I would never use that reason. Without getting into whether the codes are real or not, that really says it all, doesn't it? People like that mathematician (or Axe) will never LET themselves be convinced, because that wouldn't fit with their view of the world... Patently false. I am easily convincible. You must simply provide evidence which you have clearly FAILED to do. Sorry... but "daddy said so", doesnt make it true "Goodnight all, I'm off to discuss things with people who are actually willing to listen honestly" Thats right...when the going gets tough... run away like a good little theist Common rabbi... im sure you can do better than that peace axeman