Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.



  1. You forgot about the janitors and the Republican NASA food service workers. lol
     
    #871     Jan 28, 2016
  2. Ricter, you have go with the Republican NASA food service workers for the science of climate change. Get with the program.
     
    #872     Jan 28, 2016
  3. Ricter

    Ricter

    Haha, funny, but not fair.
     
    #873     Jan 28, 2016
  4. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Do you think they are trustworthy?
     
    #874     Jan 28, 2016
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    It's January 28, 2016 and AGW is a failed theory driving poor public policy while mankind is facing an impending natural cold cycle. Get with the program.

    P.S. - All the NASA astronauts and scientists who signed the letter are far more accomplished and knowledgeable than you.
     
    #875     Jan 28, 2016
    WeToddDid2 likes this.
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    Based on the overreach and disorganization there which gwb has just revealed, no, and neither should you. But... do you trust NASA?
     
    #876     Jan 28, 2016

  7. OK then.....NOAA. Get your climate science from them. You wanna go with their Republican boat captains. THEY know the deal.
     
    #877     Jan 28, 2016
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    And the NASA scientists, among others, who produced this summary are more knowledgeable than you.
    http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/environment/earth_energy.html
     
    #878     Jan 28, 2016
  9. #879     Jan 28, 2016
  10. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Blahahahahaha. You post a spin article from the washington post. I previously posted a published peer-reviewed paper from NASA.

    Now you think NASA is probably wrong. So, if NASA publishes an article that disagrees with your belief system, they are wrong.

    However, if NASA publishes an article that agrees with your belief system it is unequivocally true.

    This is a great illustration wrt why there are skeptics. Congratulations! You solidified my beliefs regarding being skeptical.

    You have countless times posted that NASA is one of the foremost authorities in the world regarding global warming. Therefore anyone that disagrees with them is a complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job. So which one are you? A complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job?

    You cherry picking son-of-a-bitch.

    Are you a cherry picker? You look like a cherry picker. NOW GO PICK ME SOME CHERRIES! I am hungry.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2016
    #880     Jan 28, 2016
    gwb-trading likes this.