Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    She thinks that by 2030 there will be recognition that the world is not warming.

    She remains optimistic that science will recover its equilibrium, and that the quasi-McCarthyite tide will recede: ‘I think that by 2030, temperatures will not have increased all that much. Maybe then there will be the funding to do the kind of research on natural variability that we need, to get the climate community motivated to look at things like the solar-climate connection.'
     
    #831     Jan 27, 2016
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    That's not cooling. It is more "no big deal", though.
     
    #832     Jan 27, 2016
  3. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    #833     Jan 27, 2016
    piezoe likes this.

  4. [​IMG]
     
    #834     Jan 27, 2016
  5. jem

    jem

    We have shown you a list of 33000 scientists some of them who are climate scientists who are skeptical of the fact that man made co2 causes warming.

    Could you please make a list with a link to scientists who have stated that man made co2 causes significant warming in our atmosphere.

    You probably will not be able to list more than a few... because your argument is hyped bullshit.
    Its not real.

    I give you a hint... when you type this into google

    "list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming"

    you don't get a list supporting the consensus but you get your b.s. hype of a now debunked study of 10,000 in which they took a look at on 97 of the respondents.





     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2016
    #835     Jan 28, 2016
  6. ' And this is only names I picked in the "A's." ' - which Includes 63 or 7% among 917 are MD . http://www.petitionproject.org/signers_by_last_name.php

    Q
    The 30,000 Global Warming Petition Is Easily-Debunked Propaganda
    08/22/2009

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/the-30000-global-warming_b_243092.html


    An Unverifiable Mess

    Time and time again, I have had emails from researchers who have taken random samples of names from the list and Google searched them for more information. I urge others to do the same. What you'll quickly find is either no information, very little information or information substantiating the fact that the vast majority of signers are completely unqualified in the area of climate change science.

    For example,

    "Munawwar M. Akhtar" - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.

    "Fred A. Allehoff" - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.

    "Ernest J. Andberg" - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.

    "Joseph J. Arx" - no info other than the fact that he is a signatory on the petition.

    "Adolph L. Amundson" - a paper by Amundson on the "London Tunnel Water Treatment System Acid Mine Drainage." [PDF]

    "Henry W. Apfelbach" - an Orthopedic Surgeon

    "Joe R. Arechavaleta" - runs an Architect and Engineering company.

    And this is only names I picked in the "A's." I could go on, but you get my point. The list is very difficult to verify as a third-party, but this hasn't stopped the Petition from bouncing around the internet and showing up in mainstream media.

    Given all this it seems to me that anyone touting this as proof that "global warming is a hoax" completely misunderstands the process of scientific endeavor or has completely exhausted any real argument that rightfully brings into to doubt the reality of climate change.

    UQ
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2016
    #836     Jan 28, 2016
    futurecurrents likes this.
  7. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Thank you for the incentive.
     
    #837     Jan 28, 2016
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    Now how does this work? Shouldn't the surface of the glass be blocking the sun's energy and causing cooling of the interior? Jem?

    Greenhouse Built Around A Home Is A Brilliant Way To Beat The Winter Blues
    “It’s like a bubble.”
    01/28/2016 10:58 am ET
    Elyse Wanshel

    "Do you dream of eternal spring? Here is something that will make a smile bloom on your face.

    "Marie Granmar and Charles Sacilotto of Stockholm built a greenhouse around their home to keep it warm all year round.

    “It’s like a bubble,” Granmar says in the video above, by Kirsten Dirksen, of her home in which she’s able to grow tomatoes, cucumbers and figs even in the frigid Nordic winter.

    "According to The Weather Channel, the average temperature in Sweden in January spans between 23 to 31 degrees Fahrenheit. But Sacilotto says with just one hour of sunlight, her family can enjoy playing on their glass-covered rooftop deck, which is literally located on their old roof that was removed and made into a sunlit living area with lounging chairs."



    More >>
     
    #838     Jan 28, 2016
    futurecurrents likes this.
  9. Ric, it's just as likely that volcanoes under the house are doing the heating. There's no science showing greenhouses hold in heat. Just show me ONE science paper proving it.


    Oh, I forgot............troll. ;)
     
    #839     Jan 28, 2016
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    To be fair, it should be a scientific paper showing manmade greenhouses hold in heat, but I agree.

    Is there such a scientific paper, re greenhouses?

    Edit: lol @ volcanoes.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2016
    #840     Jan 28, 2016