Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.


  1. The real question is why you refer to a non-science, fossil fuel industry funded website for information about science?

    That website is a joke and full of lies, disinformation and propaganda. Say bah.......sheep. Idiot.
     
    #791     Jan 26, 2016
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Every time an organization makes an outrageous claim about a problem not backed by facts or science - it leads to a situation where the world does not address the issue. Because all the detractors will point to the absurd claims and ensure that no action is taken.

    When organizations provide proper research backed by science and data which is not fabricated it is far more likely that a convincing argument will be made to address the issue with wide-spread backing.

    Every time absurd claims are put forward - whether it is for climate change or for plastics in the ocean - the individuals making the assertions are undermining their own causes they claim to support.

    I support green energy, pollution control, and meaningful environmentalism. I am opposed to unsafe fracking. However I find that climate change fear-mongering with the associated absurd fraudulent claims from alarmists undermine all the initiatives I support by creating broad dissent and diverting money to address non-existent "climate change" instead of spending funds on issues backed by obvious reality.
     
    #792     Jan 26, 2016

  3. But you are obviously wrong about AGW so we must assume that you are also wrong with your calculations here. Frankly, in matters of science you have zero credibility.
     
    #793     Jan 26, 2016
  4. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Live your AGW fantasy. Many of the leading climate scientists in the U.S. agree with me - such as Dr. Judith Curry.
     
    #794     Jan 26, 2016

  5. So then you believe in AGW.
     
    #795     Jan 26, 2016
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Why don't you go to Judith Curry's Climate Etc. page and read what she has to say. A little education will not hurt you.

    http://judithcurry.com/
     
    #796     Jan 26, 2016
  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Remember When The NY Times Predicted The ‘End Of Snow’
    http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/25/remember-when-the-ny-times-predicted-the-end-of-snow/

    It’s been nearly two years since The New York Times published an article claiming the “end of snow” was nigh because of man-made global warming.

    “Europe has lost half of its Alpine glacial ice since the 1850s, and if climate change is not reined in, two-thirds of European ski resorts will be likely to close by 2100,” Peter Fox, the editor of Powder magazine, wrote in an op-ed in February 2014.

    “The same could happen in the United States, where in the Northeast, more than half of the 103 ski resorts may no longer be viable in 30 years because of warmer winters,” Fox wrote.


    (More in-depth coverage of blatant stupidity at above url. People who write nonsense like the NYT article deserve to be snowed in.)
     
    #797     Jan 26, 2016
  8. Wallet

    Wallet

    It's hot, climate change
    It's cold, climate change
    It's snowing, climate change
    It's not snowing, climate change
    It's raining, climate change
    It's not raining, climate change
    Poor gas mileage, climate change
    Hemorrhoids, climate change...
    ad nauseum
     
    #798     Jan 26, 2016
    WeToddDid2, Tom B and gwb-trading like this.

  9. Yes, you idiot, she is one of the over 97% that believe man is causing is rapid global warming.

    And I've pointed this out multiple times

    Holy crap you are deluded and ignorant.
     
    #799     Jan 26, 2016

  10. ^Moronic conservatives? Climate change.
     
    #800     Jan 26, 2016