fraudcurrent's leftism has reached the diseased mind stage. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015...elted-reactors-exist-idea-will-developed.html The Chief Of The Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Has Admitted That The Technology Needed To Decommission Three Melted-Down Reactors Does Not Exist, And He Has No Idea How It Will Be Developed” Posted on April 7, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog Containing Fukushima Is Beyond Current Technology Preface: As you read this post, please keep in mind: The reactors didn’t just suffer a melt down, or even a China syndrome type melt-through, but a series of melt outs. Scientists have no idea where the cores of the nuclear reactors are. Well actually, maybe they have found them … scattered all over kingdom come. In response to the Fukushima crisis, Japan banned journalism, and Japan has once again gone fascist. If the heads of Fukushima are publicly telling mainstream media such as NHK that things are bad – and the government is letting them do it – you know things are really bad … We reported in 2012 that top nuclear experts say that the technology doesn’t yet even exist to clean up Fukushima. Now, the head of the Fukushima nuclear plant and the head of decommissioning at Fukushima both say that the technology doesn’t exist to clean up Fukushima, and it may not exist for hundreds of years … if ever. The Times of London reported last month: The chief of the Fukushima nuclear power station has admitted that the technology needed to decommission three melted-down reactors does not exist, and he has no idea how it will be developed. In a stark reminder of the challenge facing the Japanese authorities, Akira Ono conceded that the stated goal of decommissioning the plant by 2051 may be impossible without a giant technological leap. “There are so many uncertainties involved. We need to develop many, many technologies,” Mr. Ono said. more at the link... http://time.com/17360/low-level-fukushima-radiation-set-to-hit-west-coast/ (for those not use to propaganda... this is like to be a rolling release. soon it will be yeah... more than anticipated... etc.) how any big govt pre fascist moron could call this safe is beyond my comprehension. they don't even know if one of the reactors can be stopped... still as it Researchers who are tracking the radiation released during Japan's Fukushima reactor disaster say low levels will hit the U.S. in April, but added it shouldn't be enough to pose a threat to human beings, wildlife or the environment radiation will reach ocean waters along the United States’ West Coast next month, scientists said, as fallout from the Fukushima nuclear disaster drifts across the Pacific Ocean. Radiation will be at levels low enough to leave humans and the environment unharmed, scientists predict, but there are calls for increased monitoring as federal agencies currently do not sample Pacific Coast seawater for radiation, reports USA Today. A 9.0 magnitude earthquake in March 2011 triggered a tsunami with waves as high as 133 feet off the coast of Japan, killing more than 15,000 people and injuring 6,000. The disaster cut off power to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant complex, causing meltdowns at three reactors and leaking contaminated water into the ocean. Models show the contaminated water reaching north of Seattle first, then move down the West coast, most likely in April, scientists said.
Must have a doctorate in climate science- got to, to be this stupid. ------------------ EPA Chief: Ask any U.S. soldier and ‘they will tell you’ ‘climate change’ is major ‘national security’ threat Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/#ixzz3rWAEFd1H
Must simply be the typical ignorant conservative to write what you just did. LOL The Pentagon released a landmark report yesterday declaring climate change an "immediate risk" to national security and outlining how it intends to protect bases, prepare for humanitarian disasters and plan for global conflicts. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel unveiled the plan at the Conference of Defense Ministers of the Americas in Peru, where he said defense leaders "must be part of this global discussion" on climate change. Militaries, he added, "must be clear-eyed about the security threats presented by climate change, and we must be pro-active in addressing them." Hagel, who led an effort to kill the 1997 Kyoto Protocol when he served in the U.S. Senate, also embraced upcoming U.N. negotiations in Lima, Peru, aimed at developing a new global agreement. That deal is expected to be signed in Paris at the end of 2015, and leaders hope to see a draft emerge at the Lima climate talks in December. "Climate change is a 'threat multiplier' because it has the potential to exacerbate many of the challenges we already confront today—from infectious disease to armed insurgencies—and to produce new challenges in the future," he said. The 20-page "2014 Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap" warns that rising sea levels could flood coastal military bases in the United States and around the world, while droughts and extreme weather could leave leave military training areas vulnerable, hinder the execution of amphibious landings or complicate surveillance and reconnaissance capability. http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...to-national-security-posed-by-global-warming/
Under orders from the Obama administration, the military just took out the old report from 40 years ago and they crossed out 1975 and replaced it with today's date and replaced "global cooling" with "climate change".
UK to close coal power stations by 2025 "The U.K. government has announced plans to shut all unabated coal-fired power stations by 2025 and to limit their use by 2023. Unabated power stations have no carbon capture facility to allow carbon dioxide emissions to be buried. "Energy security comes first and I am determined to ensure that the U.K. has secure, affordable, and clean energy supplies that hardworking families and businesses can rely on now and in the future," Amber Rudd, Energy and Climate Change Secretary, said in a statement on the department's website...." http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/18/uk-to-close-coal-power-stations-by-2025.html <--that is water steam from nuclear power plants
AP FACT CHECK: On climate science, most GOP candidates fail "This individual understands less about science (and climate change) than the average kindergartner," Michael Mann, a Pennsylvania State University meteorology professor, wrote of Cruz's statements. "That sort of ignorance would be dangerous in a doorman, let alone a president." http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...e-science-most-gop-candidates-fail/ar-BBnkNiz
The community that stood up to coal "...Yet it's also a cautionary tale. Turns out, you can oppose coal all you want. But, even in 2015, when the market for coal is crashing and concerns about public health and climate change are on high, that doesn't mean you'll be able to stop burning it. Or keep it from burning you. Carbon budgets Before I introduce you to some people I met on the reservation, I need to make something clear: The Northern Cheyenne's war against coal isn't a local story. It's one of global importance. We have to decide to recognize that. World leaders are gathering in Paris on November 30 for perhaps the most important climate change negotiations in history. The goal: Stop warming short of 2 degrees Celsius, measured as a temperature increase since the industrial revolution. That's the danger zone for global warming -- when droughts are expected to get even more supercharged, many species are put at increased risk for extinction and low-lying island nations drown beneath rising seas. Nearly every country has agreed 2 degrees is too much...." http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/23/opinions/sutter-coal-montana-two-degrees/index.html
Climate Change is a political issue, not a scientific one. There is very little scientific evidence that AGW exists, nor are moderately rising CO2 levels well within historical means dangerous. The only scientists who support "climate change" are the ones getting grants from the government to "research" it. There are a rising number of leading scientific voices saying the entire "climate change" agenda is a sham.
I've said it before. This is perhaps the best indicator of just how dumb conservatives are. This is an objective measure of the intellectual level of the GOP/TP/Libertarian cretins. It's low.