Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.

  1. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    If the previous post didn't brighten your day, this one will.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/afp-...ck-perry-as-energy-secretary-us-media-2016-12
    REPORTS: Trump picks former Texas Governor Rick Perry as energy secretary

    Are you going to move out of the country and renounce your citizenship?
     
    #2451     Dec 13, 2016
    jem and gwb-trading like this.
  2. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    IT IS THE SUN STUPID!

    Below is an article about a new peer-reviewed study published by Nature.

    Some excerpts below:

    http://news.wisc.edu/from-rocks-in-colorado-evidence-of-a-chaotic-solar-system/

    "Where and how much solar radiation a planet gets is a key driver of climate."

    “The impact of astronomical cycles on climate can be quite large,” explains Meyers, noting as an example the pacing of the Earth’s ice ages, which have been reliably matched to periodic changes in the shape of Earth’s orbit, and the tilt of our planet on its axis. “Astronomical theory permits a very detailed evaluation of past climate events that may provide an analog for future climate.”

    Here is the study:

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7642/full/nature21402.html
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2017
    #2452     Feb 25, 2017
    traderob and jem like this.
  3. jem

    jem

    thank you. more science showing that the climate change is driven by the sun.

    Why is that so hard to believe for the science deniers who think man made co2 causes all the warming.
     
    #2453     Feb 25, 2017
    WeToddDid2 likes this.
  4. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Cold extermination: One of greatest mass extinctions was due to an ice age and not to Earth's warming

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170306091927.htm

    The Earth has known several mass extinctions over the course of its history. One of the most important happened at the Permian-Triassic boundary 250 million years ago. Over 95% of marine species disappeared and, up until now, scientists have linked this extinction to a significant rise in Earth temperatures. But researchers have now discovered that this extinction took place during a short ice age which preceded the global climate warming. It's the first time that the various stages of a mass extinction have been accurately understood and that scientists have been able to assess the major role played by volcanic explosions in these climate processes.

    Teams of researchers led by Professor Urs Schaltegger from the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the Faculty of Science of the UNIGE and by Hugo Bucher, from the University of Zürich, have been working on absolute dating for many years. They work on determining the age of minerals in volcanic ash, which establishes a precise and detailed chronology of Earth's climate evolution.

    "We therefore have proof that the species disappeared during an ice age caused by the activity of the first volcanism in the Siberian Traps," added Urs Schaltegger. This ice age was followed by the formation of limestone deposits through bacteria, marking the return of life on Earth at more moderate temperatures. The period of intense climate warming, related to the emplacement of large amounts of basalt of the Siberian Traps and which we previously thought was responsible for the extinction of marine species, in fact happened 500,000 years after the Permian-Triassic boundary.
     
    #2454     Mar 8, 2017
    jem likes this.
  5. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    ..
     
    #2455     Mar 8, 2017
  6. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Even the climate scientist are starting to figure out IT IS THE SUN STUPID!

    This research blows holes in many of Fraudcurrents religions beliefs such as solar fluctuations have little to no impact on climate and that volcanic eruptions somehow caused a mini ice age Northern Europe. So stupid. That is completely illogical. A huge win for so called climate skeptics.

    Some excerpts below:

    http://www.snf.ch/en/researchinFocu...climate-change-quantified-for-first-time.aspx

    For the first time, model calculations show a plausible way that fluctuations in solar activity could have a tangible impact on the climate. Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.

    Researchers from the Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos (PMOD), the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), ETH Zurich and the University of Bern are now qualifying this assumption. Their elaborate model calculations are supplying a robust estimate of the contribution that the sun is expected to make to temperature change in the next 100 years. For the first time, a significant effect is apparent. They expect the Earth's temperature to fall by half a degree when solar activity reaches its next minimum.

    The Swiss researchers assumed a greater fluctuation in the radiation striking the Earth than previous models had done. Schmutz is convinced that "this is the only way that we can understand the natural fluctuations in our climate over the last few millennia." He says that other hypotheses, such as the effect of major volcanic eruptions, are less conclusive.

    But since we have been observing a consistently strong phase since 1950, it is highly likely that we will experience another low point in 50 to 100 years' time. It could be every bit as intense as the Maunder Minimum, which brought particularly cold weather during the 17th century.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2017
    #2456     Apr 1, 2017
    jem likes this.
  7. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    To be fair, it's also the same Vatican that trained Galileo in science, along with Georges Lemaître, and Gregor Mendel.


    As for global warming; everyone knows Nuclear is the fastest and cleanest alternative to get us carbon neutral yet the left vehemently opposes it. Which begs the question, are they really in a hurry to fix the issue, or only if it makes them warm and fuzzy on the inside?
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2017
    #2457     Apr 1, 2017
  8. It's not the sun.
     
    #2458     Apr 1, 2017
  9. I thought you were a Democrat Here4money? This is why a 3rd party candidate will win in 2020. People are tired of do-nothing Republicans as well as Democrats who just want to feel warm and fuzzy with virtue signaling.
     
    #2459     Apr 1, 2017
  10. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Nah, I lean left on a lot of social issues. Mostly fiscal conservative and trained in science so I can't go against logic/empirical fact on many things.
     
    #2460     Apr 2, 2017