Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.

  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    That was debunked at wattsupwiththat.com.
     
    #2291     Nov 22, 2016
    futurecurrents likes this.
  2. fhl

    fhl

    #2292     Nov 23, 2016
    Tom B and gwb-trading like this.
  3. stu

    stu

    fake news
    fake words
    fake denial

    the evolution of a gw refusenik

    2012
    it's a Chinese hoax”

    2016
    “I have an open mind to it
    on human activity...
    "I think there is some connectivity. There is some, something.”

    Darn the pesky science.
     
    #2293     Nov 23, 2016
    Ricter likes this.
  4. jem

    jem

    you lie. the NASA experiment was not debunked. anthony watts wrote that article to make sure people understood that co2 warms and cools not just cools. If you understood the article you would understand that the same mechanism which bounces IR back to earth... (warming) bounces IR and other heat waves back into to space... (cooling)

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03...es-and-the-thermosphere-is-making-the-rounds/


    "Yes, of course the upper atmosphere is going to deflect and re-radiate the energy of solar storms, that’s why we don’t burn to a cinder when they happen. There’s nothing new here, this is what the upper atmosphere (thermosphere) does."







     
    #2294     Nov 23, 2016
  5. jem

    jem

    your comment is beyond purposeful ignorance... it manifests everything that is wrong with agw nuts. They deny real science.

    If you block warming rays before they hit you house... that is a cooling effect. Regardless of where in the atmosphere co2 did it.

     
    #2295     Nov 23, 2016
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    It's your conclusion that's debunked, genius.
     
    #2296     Nov 23, 2016
    futurecurrents likes this.

  7. I don't deny real science. What you are doing is slimey lawyer deceptive science. So shove it up far and deep slimey lawyer.
     
    #2297     Nov 23, 2016
  8. jem

    jem

    prove the nasa experiment has been debunked you science denying troll. seriously how can you or fc or anyone debunk the findings of this satellite...

    especially when it confirms co2 captures energy and shoots some of it back in the direction it came.

    You realize that the atmosphere... blocks the vast majority of potential heat and energy coming in... don't you?

    Why are you all so ignorant of science.



     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2016
    #2298     Nov 23, 2016
  9. jem

    jem

    how the hell can anyone debunk this?
    Unless you have competing satellites it can't be debunked you agw trolls...



    https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

    ...
    That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.

    “The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”

    For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.

    [​IMG]
    A surge of infrared radiation from nitric oxide molecules on March 8-10, 2012, signals the biggest upper-atmospheric heating event in seven years. Credit: SABER/TIMED. See also
    the CO2 data
    .
    In human terms, this is a lot of energy. According to the New York City mayor’s office, an average NY household consumes just under 4700 kWh annually. This means the geomagnetic storm dumped enough energy into the atmosphere to power every home in the Big Apple for two years.

    “Unfortunately, there’s no practical way to harness this kind of energy,” says Mlynczak. “It’s so diffuse and out of reach high above Earth’s surface. Plus, the majority of it has been sent back into space by the action of CO2 and NO.”
     
    #2299     Nov 23, 2016
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    I didn't say the observation was debunked, only that the conclusions you're insisting on drawing from it have been debunked... by your very own chief skeptic, wattsupwiththat.
     
    #2300     Nov 23, 2016