Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.

  1. stu

    stu

    The science that supports AGW isn't about wild predictions of global warming destruction any more than Special Relativity is about stuff falling down all over the place. Denying that basic science because of separate agendas, usually political, is what fuckwits, like yourself do, mainly because you have no idea what the wtf the actual science explains.

    It's rationality that needs more than an apology from you.
     
    #2261     Nov 22, 2016
  2. stu

    stu

    Some people never did come to the right conclusion as you quaintly put it. One reason why Einstein never received a Nobel prize for Relativity. Too many people acting like idiots. And those who had no clue , you know, like you.
     
    #2262     Nov 22, 2016
  3. fhl

    fhl

    Thank God for president Trump. Prayers of the righteous have been answered.
    The scam is on it's last legs and is doomed to destruction. The earth isn't doomed as halfwits would have us believe, the scam is.
     
    #2263     Nov 22, 2016
  4. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Every 40 years the natural short-term cycle changes hot to cold or the inverse. The 1930s were hot, the 1970s were cold. the 2010 period is warm, the 2050s will be cold again.

    You and your fellow global warming alarmists are going to look very foolish in 40 years.
     
    #2264     Nov 22, 2016
  5. stu

    stu

    wtf has that got to do with the science behind AGW. Whether the planet warms and cools naturally or not has no bearing at all on science showing why pumping billions of tons of pollutants into the atmosphere every year unnaturally creates a greenhouse gas effect.

    And I don't have to wait 40 years to see how foolish you are being right now.
     
    #2265     Nov 22, 2016
  6. stu

    stu

    yeah , anti semites were saying similar things about Einstein and his Relativity scam at the time
     
    #2266     Nov 22, 2016
  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    CO2 is not a pollutant. The amount of man-made CO2 placed into the atmosphere is miniscule when compared to naturally occurring CO2.

    If you want to be concerned about tons of pollutants being pumped into the atmosphere each year then you should focus on hard particle pollutants from power and manufacturing plants. But... of course... the Obama Administration INCREASED hard particle pollution by demanding power plants remove hard particle scrubbers and replace them with CO2 scrubbers to fight non-existent "global warming". All of those who suffer from asthma and other respiratory problems in the Carolinas may have a few choice words for this failed Obama policy.
     
    #2267     Nov 22, 2016
  8. stu

    stu

    CO2 is enough of a pollutant so that too much and you'll suffocate along with a few other undesirable effects in between.

    But Non of what you say alters the science behind AGW anymore than it alters the science behind Relativity. So tell it to the birds. Like I said, that's a political argument.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2016
    #2268     Nov 22, 2016

  9. How much colder would the earth be without CO2?

    We'll wait for you to figure out how to use Google.
     
    #2269     Nov 22, 2016
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    We will wait for you to stop repeating the same old nonsense over & over again hundreds of times like a retarded parrot.
     
    #2270     Nov 22, 2016