Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Jun 16, 2015.


  1. And absolutely no science to back up your ignorant opinion.
     
    #2151     Nov 16, 2016

  2. The scientists don't think so. Gee, who should we believe, you, or the experts? Hmmm.
     
    #2152     Nov 16, 2016
  3. jem

    jem

    you tell us how the hockey stick could be legit.

    Its grafts instrument data onto proxy data.
    When the proxy data is carried forward it contradicts the hockey stick.

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    #2153     Nov 16, 2016
    Buy1Sell2 likes this.
  4. jem

    jem

    [​IMG]
     
    #2154     Nov 16, 2016
    Buy1Sell2, WeToddDid2 and gwb-trading like this.
  5. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    This chart is closer to the actual shape of the temps over this period. The deviation in avg temp is much greater though than "point something"
     
    #2155     Nov 16, 2016
  6. Yeah, science charts always have stuff drawn on them to tell you what to think. Are you idiots serious?

    Sorry, but I'll stay with what the scientists think and they think the hockey stick is correct.
     
    #2156     Nov 16, 2016
  7. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    The other individual's chart was prepared with a predetermined result in mind. Very insincere and sinister
     
    #2157     Nov 16, 2016
  8. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    ---and man is not contributing (which is correct)
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2016
    #2158     Nov 17, 2016
  9. Ricter

    Ricter

    No one of any repute believes that anymore. The argument has moved on without you. That AGW will not a catastrophe is the current position held by holdouts in science, government, and business.
     
    #2159     Nov 17, 2016
  10. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    You do understand that both polar ice caps are increasing in size, and that the slight warming trend ended 20 yrs ago correct?
     
    #2160     Nov 17, 2016